On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 14:06 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On 12/01/2011 06:54 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Seems reasonable. I agree with pros and cons and suggestions but I am
not the person to make the
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 09:42 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/05/2011 09:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 14:06 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/01/2011 08:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On 12/01/2011 06:54 PM, Dmitri
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011, John Dennis wrote:
My guess is we're not likely to be bumping up against the 1 MB per
item threshold (nor would it be smart to anywhere be close to that).
I think I recalled you mentioning that PAC data would max out around
16 KB. So I don't see the limit as being
On 12/01/2011 08:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 19:31 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
On 12/01/2011 06:54 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Seems reasonable. I agree with pros and cons and suggestions but I am
not the person to make the final approval. Simo?
Question for John: Is there any
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent write-up John, it is very comprehensive and lays
down things very clearly.
I agree that using ipa:ipa for memcached and wsgi would be a better
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:22 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent write-up John, it is very comprehensive and lays
down things very clearly.
I
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:22 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent write-up John, it is very comprehensive and lays
down things very
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:46 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:22 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent
On 12/01/2011 09:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent write-up John, it is very comprehensive and lays
down things very clearly.
Thank you.
I agree that using ipa:ipa for
On 11/30/2011 05:33 PM, John Dennis wrote:
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Seems reasonable. I agree with pros and cons and suggestions but I am
not the person to make
On 12/01/2011 06:54 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Seems reasonable. I agree with pros and cons and suggestions but I am
not the person to make the final approval. Simo?
Question for John: Is there any benefit for CLI or it is for UI only?
Currently it would benefit the UI only. That's mostly because
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:33 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sorry for the late reply.
First of all, excellent write-up John, it is very comprehensive and lays
down things very clearly.
I agree that using ipa:ipa for memcached and wsgi would be a better
proposition for us.
--
John Dennis jden...@redhat.com
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
[ Note: This document is formatted in restructuredText and may be
viewed in HTML at this link:
http://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/doc/ipa_session.html ]
Session Support for IPA
John Dennis
13 matches
Mail list logo
