Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA

2015-06-05 Thread Innes, Duncan
-Original Message- From: Martin Kosek [mailto:mko...@redhat.com] Sent: 05 June 2015 13:31 To: Innes, Duncan; freeipa-devel@redhat.com; Jakub Hrozek Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA On 06/02/2015 10:29 AM, Innes, Duncan wrote: Just a bit of a head's up

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA

2015-06-02 Thread Innes, Duncan
Just a bit of a head's up and a refresh of this with perhaps some new data. Good to hear :-) We recently also started investigating the Audit capabilities for (notice I write for and not in) IPA. You can check my initial nudge to the freeipa-users list, which was unfortunately with no

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA

2015-04-29 Thread Innes, Duncan
On 28/04/2015 19:08 PM, Young, Adam wrote: I think I am in alignment with what you are saying. I like rsyslogd as the basic ship the log off the server tool. Let's use what the platform support first natively and formost; We want something native, not Ruby, not even Python if we can

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA

2015-04-29 Thread Innes, Duncan
-Original Message- From: Martin Kosek [mailto:mko...@redhat.com] Sent: 29 April 2015 07:42 To: Innes, Duncan; freeipa-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA On 04/28/2015 05:58 PM, Innes, Duncan wrote: Folks, The A part of IPA has always

[Freeipa-devel] Suggestion for the A part of IPA

2015-04-28 Thread Innes, Duncan
Folks, The A part of IPA has always been of great interest to me. Our current IPA infrastructure works well at the I P parts, giving us great failover abilities and connectivity through hardware firewalls without punching too many holes. Whilst the A part may not be solely about centralised