On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Patrice Duc-Jacquet <
patrice.duc.jacq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>
> Gabe Alford wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your patch as well.
>>>
>>> >-doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10)'),
On 05/03/2016 04:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Gabe Alford wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your patch as well.
>-doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10)'),
>+doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10). See
RFC 5280 (paragraph 5.3.1) for reason details'),
Gabe Alford wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your patch as well.
>-doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10)'),
>+doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10). See
RFC 5280 (paragraph 5.3.1) for reason details'),
Rather than just specifying the RFC with the
Hello,
Thank you for your patch as well.
>-doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10)'),
>+doc=_('Reason for revoking the certificate (0-10). See RFC
5280 (paragraph 5.3.1) for reason details'),
Rather than just specifying the RFC with the paragraph to go look up,
On 03.05.2016 16:01, Patrice Duc-Jacquet wrote:
Hi everyone
this is my first patch. So I may have done thhings nor in a proper
way. Please let me know if something is wrong in the proceess I
followed. With regards
Pat
Hello,
thank you for your patch. Please remove changes in .po and
Hi everyone
this is my first patch. So I may have done thhings nor in a proper way.
Please let me know if something is wrong in the proceess I followed.
With regards
Pat
>From bb06bd55c9f68af1a3aa01b671757abfbb45c822 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrice Duc-Jacquet