Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 8.6.2011 16:56, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2011 17:21, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Make data type of certificates more obvious/predictable internally.
For the most part certificates will be treated as being in DER format.
When we load a certificate we w
On 8.6.2011 16:56, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2011 17:21, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Make data type of certificates more obvious/predictable internally.
For the most part certificates will be treated as being in DER format.
When we load a certificate we will generally accept
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 18.5.2011 17:21, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Make data type of certificates more obvious/predictable internally.
For the most part certificates will be treated as being in DER format.
When we load a certificate we will generally accept it in any format but
will convert it to DE
On 18.5.2011 17:21, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Make data type of certificates more obvious/predictable internally.
For the most part certificates will be treated as being in DER format.
When we load a certificate we will generally accept it in any format but
will convert it to DER before proceeding i
Make data type of certificates more obvious/predictable internally.
For the most part certificates will be treated as being in DER format.
When we load a certificate we will generally accept it in any format but
will convert it to DER before proceeding in normalize_certificate().
This also re
