John Dennis wrote:
Who wrote our autogen.sh script and why?
Why aren't we using autoreconf instead?
FWIW autogen.sh is seriously broken, it's getting incorrect results when
comparing different versions of tools. It thinks 1.7 is newer than 1.11
because it's doing string comparisons which caus
On 01/25/2010 03:57 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 01/25/2010 03:36 PM, John Dennis wrote:
Who wrote our autogen.sh script and why?
Why aren't we using autoreconf instead?
FWIW autogen.sh is seriously broken, it's getting incorrect results
when comparing different versions of tools. It thinks 1.
On 01/25/2010 03:36 PM, John Dennis wrote:
Who wrote our autogen.sh script and why?
Why aren't we using autoreconf instead?
FWIW autogen.sh is seriously broken, it's getting incorrect results
when comparing different versions of tools. It thinks 1.7 is newer
than 1.11 because it's doing strin
Who wrote our autogen.sh script and why?
Why aren't we using autoreconf instead?
FWIW autogen.sh is seriously broken, it's getting incorrect results when
comparing different versions of tools. It thinks 1.7 is newer than 1.11
because it's doing string comparisons which causes it to run the wro
