On 25.3.2013 16:21, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/25/2013 02:41 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
I checked what you have already and this is what I found:
1) Internal error if I try to remove krbticketflags via *attr functions:
# ipa service-add foo/`hostname` --setattr=krbticketflags=None
ipa: ERROR: an i
Hi, I have some comments & questions.
Navigation:
* Dojo/topic is used to handle low-level UI events such as facet-show
and facet-change. Is it possible to use dojo/on or direct method calls?
I suppose topics would also run slower (although that might not be an
issue).
Dojo/topic seem to be
On 03/21/2013 03:11 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> The higher version is reported to fix a Fedora 17 to 18 upgrade issue.
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3399
>
ACKed by Alexander on IRC, I was just advised to bump selinux-policy even more
to 3.11.1-86 as it is in stable Fedora repo + fix
Hello,
Log plugin version during startup.
--
Petr^2 Spacek
From ab91b26ee8ede6b2909f8dd8b305ed960752c55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Spacek
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:43:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Log plugin version during startup.
Signed-off-by: Petr Spacek
---
src/zone_manager.c | 4
Hello,
Update NEWS file for upcoming 2.6 release.
--
Petr^2 Spacek
From cd2a02874950ea9e045763c4a316069a00894d5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Spacek
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:22:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update NEWS file for upcoming 2.6 release.
Signed-off-by: Petr Spacek
---
NEWS |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:45:02PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Log plugin version during startup.
Good idea, ack.
> From ab91b26ee8ede6b2909f8dd8b305ed960752c55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Petr Spacek
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:43:52 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Log plugin version
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:46:52PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Update NEWS file for upcoming 2.6 release.
Ack
> From cd2a02874950ea9e045763c4a316069a00894d5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Petr Spacek
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:22:36 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Update NEWS file for u
Hello,
Bump NVR to 2.6.
I will do 2.6 release as soon as this will be pushed :-)
--
Petr^2 Spacek
From 6e09c4cfb87fc946c0c199a0fafeb5a7149e5be0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Spacek
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Bump NVR to 2.6.
Signed-off-by: Petr Spacek
---
On 26.3.2013 15:47, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:45:02PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Log plugin version during startup.
Good idea, ack.
Pushed to
master: 5aeaffd2008390e68e9ff8facaba38f54bc1587e
v2: dca5eeb785d9cdd529a1bd757133023ea5560ac4
--
Petr^2 Spacek
__
On 26.3.2013 15:48, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:46:52PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Update NEWS file for upcoming 2.6 release.
Ack
Pushed to
master: 5aeaffd2008390e68e9ff8facaba38f54bc1587e
v2: 6d2812bf65758e370e2c98a4b1b32aab26f71dfd
--
Petr^2 Spacek
__
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bump NVR to 2.6.
>
>
> I will do 2.6 release as soon as this will be pushed :-)
Ack
> From 6e09c4cfb87fc946c0c199a0fafeb5a7149e5be0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Petr Spacek
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:00 +0100
>
On 26.3.2013 16:27, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Bump NVR to 2.6.
>
>
>I will do 2.6 release as soon as this will be pushed:-)
Ack
Pushed to v2: 695e7d352c515c3bd182356594a9f79e270f1172
--
Petr^2 Spacek
On 03/22/2013 02:22 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
[...]
Design is now at: http://freeipa.org/page/V3/CA-less_install
Patch 199 deferred to https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3529
Updated patches attached.
Orion Poplawski found a bug in the patches: the CA cert wasn't loaded
into the server
Hi,
The ipa-replica-install script tries to add replica's A and PTR
records to the master DNS, if master does manage DNS. However,
master need not to manage replica's zone. Properly handle this use
case.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3496
>From 2214bdc9627bdd4cec6b9b9fccffedb717536d97
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/23/2013 05:06 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There are strict limits on what can be restored where. Only exact
matching hostnames and versions are allowed right now. We can probably
relax the hostname requirement if we're only restoring data, and the
version perhaps for onl
The FreeIPA team is proud to announce version FreeIPA v3.1.3.
It can be downloaded from http://www.freeipa.org/page/Downloads. The new
version has also been built for Fedora 18 and is on its way to updates-testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freeipa-3.1.3-1.fc18
This release includes
On 03/21/2013 11:59 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> This set of patches (details in commit messages) allow build and installation
> of FreeIPA in Fedora 19. I tested server and replica install (master on f18,
> replica on f19) and both worked fine.
>
> The patches are compatible with Fedora 18 (I tested
On 03/26/2013 05:38 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/21/2013 11:59 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
This set of patches (details in commit messages) allow build and installation
of FreeIPA in Fedora 19. I tested server and replica install (master on f18,
replica on f19) and both worked fine.
The patches ar
On 03/26/2013 06:32 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 03/26/2013 05:38 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/21/2013 11:59 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
This set of patches (details in commit messages) allow build and installation
of FreeIPA in Fedora 19. I tested server and replica install (master on f18,
replica o
On 3/25/2013 6:46 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Reimplemented ^^ to match your proposal. Attaching as patches with new
numbers (271,272) as they don't have much common with the original patch.
The code looks good. Do you have a static/live demo site?
--
Endi S. Dewata
_
Add the option to create home directories for users on their first login
to ipa-server-install and ipa-replica-install.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3515
--
Regards,
Ana Krivokapic
Associate Software Engineer
FreeIPA team
Red Hat Inc.
From b0fc1c8c6ef1c574f7455192682b652032147a2e Mo
This patch uses the Fedora standard for git versioning (version-#.git)
when making rpms. I'm afraid I haven't been able to test for the non-git
version case.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380
Hello everyone,
I am a student at the Brno University of Technology and am working on my
bachelor's thesis in cooperation with Red Hat (my supervisor is Jan Zeleny).
The project is basically a Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSKC) document
parser written in Python with modules to store the parse
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specifying all
needed directories.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specifying
all needed directories.
Don't we force RPMBUILD to be the local build directory? Why would you
want to specify the files to be written
On 03/26/2013 05:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specifying
all needed directories.
Don't we force RPMBUILD to be the local build directory? Why woul
Orion Poplawski wrote:
This patch uses the Fedora standard for git versioning
(version-#.git) when making rpms. I'm afraid I haven't been able
to test for the non-git version case.
What is the purpose of this? We don't do upstream releases from
developer build, so having the wrong Source0 doe
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/26/2013 05:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specifying
all needed directories.
Don't we force RPMBUILD to be the local b
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 20:46 +0100, Petr Kubát wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> I am a student at the Brno University of Technology and am working on
> my bachelor's thesis in cooperation with Red Hat (my supervisor is Jan
> Zeleny).
> The project is basically a Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSK
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 19:14 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > This patch uses the Fedora standard for git versioning
> > (version-#.git) when making rpms. I'm afraid I haven't been able
> > to test for the non-git version case.
>
> What is the purpose of this? We don't do
On 03/26/2013 07:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 19:14 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
This patch uses the Fedora standard for git versioning
(version-#.git) when making rpms. I'm afraid I haven't been able
to test for the non-git version case.
What is the
On 03/26/2013 05:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/26/2013 05:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specifying
all needed directori
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 19:14 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
This patch uses the Fedora standard for git versioning
(version-#.git) when making rpms. I'm afraid I haven't been able
to test for the non-git vers
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/26/2013 05:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/26/2013 05:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
The current makefile make assumptions about people not redefining
_specdir/_rpmdir/_srpmdir. This patch gets around that by specify
34 matches
Mail list logo
