URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/677
Author: HonzaCholasta
Title: #677: cert: defer cert-find result post-processing
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa
git fetch ghfreeipa pull/677/head:pr677
git checkout p
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Author: HonzaCholasta
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Replace empty string with a single space in the third argument of
`AC_CHECK_LIB` (`action-if-found`) where applicable.
Empty string in the argument
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
tiran commented:
"""
Is this peculiar behavior of ```AC_CHECK_LIB``` documented somewhere?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718#issuecomment-294823623
--
Manage y
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
`info autoconf Libraries` says:
> If ACTION-IF-FOUND is not
> specified, the default action prepends `-lLIBRARY' to `LIBS' and
> defines `HAVE_LIBLIBRARY' (in all capitals
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
lslebodn commented:
"""
>It does not explicitly say what constitutes an unspecified value though.
```[]``` means default action.
BTW it is not peculiar behaviour because most project define custom LI
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
lslebodn commented:
"""
>It does not explicitly say what constitutes an unspecified value though.
```, , ``` or ``` , [] ,``` are considered as unspecified values and therefore
default action was us
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/718
Title: #718: configure: fix AC_CHECK_LIB usage
lslebodn commented:
"""
A little bit offtopic. It is interesting that you look for the function `main`
in libkrad. Because it does not exist there. I've just noticed it.
```
sh# nm --defined-only --d
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/694
Author: martbab
Title: #694: RFC: implement local PKINIT deployment in server/replica install
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa
git fetch ghfreeipa pull/694/head:pr694
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/694
Title: #694: RFC: implement local PKINIT deployment in server/replica install
martbab commented:
"""
I have added comments to the "hidden" PKINIT setup steps. I would also like
@simo5 and @abbra to answer further comments regarding thid PR. It wa
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/719
Author: stlaz
Title: #719: External CA fixes
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
External CA installation would have failed for 2 reasons:
- Trying to perform Kerberos install twice (for some reason our QA forgot to
tell us that)
- Rewriting the CA cer
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/716
Title: #716: Fix minor typos
realsobek commented:
"""
> There are no tickets associated with these changes.
On the other hand, if the ticket is required for giving attribution, I will
create it.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/fr
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/716
Title: #716: Fix minor typos
realsobek commented:
"""
> There are no tickets associated with these changes.
On the other hand, if the ticket is required for giving attribution, I will
create it.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/fr
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/719
Author: stlaz
Title: #719: External CA fixes
Action: edited
Changed field: body
Original value:
"""
External CA installation would have failed for 2 reasons:
- Trying to perform Kerberos install twice (for some reason our QA forgot to
tell us
13 matches
Mail list logo