On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 15:10 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 04/29/2014 01:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> >>> On 04/24/2014 11:35 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kos
On 04/29/2014 02:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 04/29/2014 01:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2014 11:35 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> [..
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:21 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 01:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 04/24/2014 11:35 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [...]
>
> I know, we may need to provi
On 04/29/2014 01:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 11:35 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> [...]
I know, we may need to provide another permission admins can use to turn
on anonymous search
On 04/24/2014 11:35 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
[...]
I know, we may need to provide another permission admins can use to turn
on anonymous searches for those attributes too.
We may also decide that on upgrade v
On 04/23/2014 10:53 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 18:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2014 05:21 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:37 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wro
On 04/23/2014 08:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 18:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/23/2014 05:21 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:37 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 201
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 18:19 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 05:21 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:37 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> >>> On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, M
On 04/23/2014 05:21 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:37 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>> On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wr
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:37 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Hello,
> At Devconf, we deci
On 04/17/2014 01:45 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Hello,
At Devconf, we decided what most of the default read permissions should
look
>>>
On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Hello,
At Devconf, we decided what most of the default read permissions should look
like, but we did not get to user.
Here is a draft of 4 read permissio
On 04/16/2014 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
...
>>> [mepOriginEntry]
>>> mepManagedEntry
>>
>> This is used to bind user to it's private group. We use it for example in
>> group-detach command
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 15:08 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > At Devconf, we decided what most of the default read permissions should look
> > like, but we did not get to user.
> > Here is a draft of 4 read permissions. Please comment.
> >
> >
On 04/15/2014 04:55 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Hello,
> At Devconf, we decided what most of the default read permissions should look
> like, but we did not get to user.
> Here is a draft of 4 read permissions. Please comment.
>
>
> Basic info (anonymous):
> [top]
> objectclass
> [person]
>
Hello,
At Devconf, we decided what most of the default read permissions should
look like, but we did not get to user.
Here is a draft of 4 read permissions. Please comment.
Basic info (anonymous):
[top]
objectclass
[person]
cn, sn, description
[organizationalPerson]
title
[inetOrgP
16 matches
Mail list logo