On 12.3.2015 12:21, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 17:02, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/11/2015 04:55 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 11.3.2015 15:45, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/11/2015 03:38 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Pet
On 11.3.2015 17:02, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 04:55 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 11.3.2015 15:45, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 03/11/2015 03:38 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan
On 11.3.2015 15:45, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 03:38 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>> On 10.3.2015 20:04, S
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to
On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
[0])
On 03/11/2015 04:55 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 15:45, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/11/2015 03:38 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 P
On 03/11/2015 03:38 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
> On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 1
On 11.3.2015 15:28, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10.3.2015
On 03/11/2015 12:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>> Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>>> On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-0
On 11.3.2015 11:34, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>> On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On
Dne 11.3.2015 v 11:12 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:
On 10.3.2015 20:04, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>
On 11.3.2015 08:13, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 07:24 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10
On 03/10/2015 07:24 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue,
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 19:24 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
On 10.3.2015 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:26 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 10.3.2015 17:35, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 16:19 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
> >> [0]). Here is the proposal:
> >>
> >> LDAP sc
On 10.3.2015 16:22, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 03:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
>>> [0]). Here is the proposal:
>>>
>>> LDAP schema
>>> ===
On 03/10/2015 03:53 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello,
I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
[0]). Here is the proposal:
LDAP schema
===
- 1 new attribute:
( NAME 'GenericRecord' DESC 'unknown DNS rec
On 10.3.2015 15:53, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
>> [0]). Here is the proposal:
>>
>> LDAP schema
>> ===
>> - 1 new attribute:
>> ( NAME 'GenericRecord' D
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 15:32 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
> [0]). Here is the proposal:
>
> LDAP schema
> ===
> - 1 new attribute:
> ( NAME 'GenericRecord' DESC 'unknown DNS record, RFC 3597' EQUALITY
> c
Hello,
I would like to discuss Generic support for unknown DNS RR types (RFC 3597
[0]). Here is the proposal:
LDAP schema
===
- 1 new attribute:
( NAME 'GenericRecord' DESC 'unknown DNS record, RFC 3597' EQUALITY
caseIgnoreIA5Match SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
The attribute sh
22 matches
Mail list logo