On 10/04/2012 06:14 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
Updated patches attached.
browserconfig.html points to older config method for versions prior to 15.
The extension is theoretically compatible with FF3.6 and then FF10 and
later. There is a problem for FF4-9 with loading strings from
.properties fil
On 10/5/2012 10:43 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
1. It looks like the Firefox is limited to version 10 to 15 in
install/ffextension/install.rdf. Do we need the upper limit?
10.0
15.0.*
My understanding is that maxversion represents maximum tested version.
[https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/do
Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/05/2012 05:30 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:33 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/20
On 10/05/2012 05:30 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:33 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorc
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:33 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Pe
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 17:33 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> >On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >>On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> >>>On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vo
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the re
On 10/5/2012 8:56 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the removal of
configure.jar and offer the old config
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 10/03/2012 04:19 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the removal of
configure.jar and offer the old configuration method if user is using FF
< 4 so we don
On 10/03/2012 10:19 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>> As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the removal of
>> configure.jar and offer the old configuration method if user is using FF
>> < 4 so we don't have to make the extension com
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the removal of
> configure.jar and offer the old configuration method if user is using FF
> < 4 so we don't have to make the extension compatible with this ancient
> version. It will b
As Alexander proposed in other channel. I will remove the removal of
configure.jar and offer the old configuration method if user is using FF
< 4 so we don't have to make the extension compatible with this ancient
version. It will be done this way:
If FF < 4 is detected:
* in browserconfig.ht
12 matches
Mail list logo
