Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1095 apply updates in order

2013-04-12 Thread Rob Crittenden
Petr Viktorin wrote: On 04/11/2013 09:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Rob Crittenden wrote: Petr Viktorin wrote: [...] In the README, 10 - 19 should be Schema & configuration. OK. While you're at it you can update the FDS Server reference (FDS was Fedora Directory Server, right?) Yeah, sh

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1095 apply updates in order

2013-04-12 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 04/11/2013 09:39 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Rob Crittenden wrote: Petr Viktorin wrote: [...] In the README, 10 - 19 should be Schema & configuration. OK. While you're at it you can update the FDS Server reference (FDS was Fedora Directory Server, right?) Yeah, shows how old this is. I

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1095 apply updates in order

2013-04-11 Thread Rob Crittenden
Rob Crittenden wrote: Petr Viktorin wrote: On 04/10/2013 08:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: The original design of the LDAP updater was to use numbered update files which would be applied in order in blocks of 10. We ended up just applying everything together, sorted by length of the DN. Why not

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1095 apply updates in order

2013-04-11 Thread Rob Crittenden
Petr Viktorin wrote: On 04/10/2013 08:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: The original design of the LDAP updater was to use numbered update files which would be applied in order in blocks of 10. We ended up just applying everything together, sorted by length of the DN. Why not just sort the files le

Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 1095 apply updates in order

2013-04-11 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 04/10/2013 08:02 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: The original design of the LDAP updater was to use numbered update files which would be applied in order in blocks of 10. We ended up just applying everything together, sorted by length of the DN. Why not just sort the files lexicographically, and _