On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:11 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> >> any order.
> >>
> >> This patch has a bug,
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=co
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> any order.
>
> This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
> nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to "off". However, during
> the rpm
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:14 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 17:37 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> > > any order.
> > >
> > > This patc
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 17:37 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> > any order.
> >
> > This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
> > nsslapd-access
Hi Simo,
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
This is not what I had in mind, our use cases is something like this:
aci: (target=ldap:///dc=bar)(targetattr=*) (version 3.0; acl "userattr
test"; allow (add) userattr = "managedby#USERDN";)
ldapmodify -D uid=user
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:30 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> > Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> > >> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > Thi
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:30 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> >> Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merge
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> >> This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> >> any order.
> >>
> >> This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We nee
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to "off".
Uhmm what is
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
> any order.
>
> This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
> nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to "off".
Uhmm what is the effect
On 01/09/2014 02:32 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to "off". However, during
the rpm installation, I get
13 matches
Mail list logo
