On 14.5.2013 17:42, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/14/2013 02:01 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 14.5.2013 11:45, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/10/2013 04:57 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 6.5.2013 17:40, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversi
On 05/14/2013 02:01 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 14.5.2013 11:45, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/10/2013 04:57 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 6.5.2013 17:40, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversions.
Attribute names are generated on-t
On 14.5.2013 11:45, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 05/10/2013 04:57 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 6.5.2013 17:40, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversions.
Attribute names are generated on-the-fly: String "Record" is appended
to textu
On 05/10/2013 04:57 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 6.5.2013 17:40, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversions.
Attribute names are generated on-the-fly: String "Record" is appended
to textual representation of DNS RDATA type.
St
On 6.5.2013 17:40, Tomas Hozza wrote:
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversions.
Attribute names are generated on-the-fly: String "Record" is appended
to textual representation of DNS RDATA type.
String "Record" is cut down from the attribute
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Generalize attribute_name<->rdata_type conversions.
>
> Attribute names are generated on-the-fly: String "Record" is appended
> to textual representation of DNS RDATA type.
>
> String "Record" is cut down from the attribute name during
> at
