2013/1/11 John Dennis
> On 01/11/2013 04:00 PM, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
>
>> When you say easy to upload a .po onto another branch I assume you
>> don't mean branch (TX has no such concept) but rather another TX
>> resource. Anyway this is good to know, perhaps the way TX handles
>> v
On 01/11/2013 04:00 PM, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
When you say easy to upload a .po onto another branch I assume you
don't mean branch (TX has no such concept) but rather another TX
resource. Anyway this is good to know, perhaps the way TX handles
versions is not half as bad as it would
2013/1/11 John Dennis
> On 01/11/2013 02:44 PM, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
>
>> 2013/1/11 John Dennis mailto:jden...@redhat.com>>
>>
>
> Thank you Jérôme for your insights as a translator. We have a lop-sided
> perspective mostly from the developer point of view. We need to better
> understand the trans
On 01/11/2013 02:44 PM, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
2013/1/11 John Dennis mailto:jden...@redhat.com>>
Thank you Jérôme for your insights as a translator. We have a lop-sided
perspective mostly from the developer point of view. We need to better
understand the translator's perspective.
I'm not
2013/1/11 John Dennis
> On 01/11/2013 10:04 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>> This discussion was started in private; I'll continue it here.
>>
>> On 01/10/2013 05:41 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/10/2013 04:27 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>>
On 01/09/2013 03:55 PM, John Dennis
On 01/11/2013 10:04 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Hello list,
This discussion was started in private; I'll continue it here.
On 01/10/2013 05:41 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 01/10/2013 04:27 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 01/09/2013 03:55 PM, John Dennis wrote:
And I could work on improving the i18n/t
Hello list,
This discussion was started in private; I'll continue it here.
On 01/10/2013 05:41 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 01/10/2013 04:27 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 01/09/2013 03:55 PM, John Dennis wrote:
And I could work on improving the i18n/translations infrastructure,
starting by writin