On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:32, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/17/2012 09:59 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:29, Richard Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
On 04/18/2012 07:22 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:32, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/17/2012 09:59 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:29, Richard Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I cleaned up all the ruv_compare_ruv: RUV [changelog max RUV] does
not contain element errors in the logs for each of fileservers 1, 2
and 3. The ldapsearch for
On 04/17/2012 07:26 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I cleaned up all the ruv_compare_ruv: RUV [changelog max RUV] does
not contain element errors in the logs for each of fileservers 1, 2
and
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/17/2012 07:26 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I cleaned up all the ruv_compare_ruv: RUV [changelog max RUV]
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 04/17/2012 07:26 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
I cleaned up all the
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:29, Richard Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 04/17/2012 07:26 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
On 04/17/2012 09:59 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:29, Richard Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:26, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 04/17/2012 07:26 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 17:44,
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to add/remove replicas many
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be some
corruption since there's an entry which
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 13:39 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeIPA for a couple of years (Upgraded/Migrated from
FreeIPA 1). The servers are in various states (Some upgraded from
Fedora 10/11 through each release, some fresh installs of Fedora
15/16). I've also had to
On 04/13/2012 12:22 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 13:43, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 11:39 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I'm convinced that my LDAP directories contain lots of cruft which has
built up and is causing problems on my system. There may even be
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like I've been emailing this list once a week or
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
Simo: Thanks - I'd prefer to clean it up properly rather than start
from scratch. I haven't changed the LDAP schema at all. All I've done
is the use the IPA tools for user admin and add/remove replicas.
I just felt like
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
first.
You are correct. Try this:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 01:03 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it can't be deleted because it's
not a leaf node, but it doesn't have any sub-entries that I can delete
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead and run
CLEANRUV.
I cleaned up a load of
On 04/13/2012 03:40 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:41, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:24, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.comwrote:
It's not a problem until it's a problem :-) I would go ahead
18 matches
Mail list logo
