[Freeipa-users] Dynamic DNS

2013-04-30 Thread Guy Matz
hi! Anyone out there gotten Dynamic DNS freeipa-managed DNS server? I've been trying for days following instructions from various freeipa and redhat docs! I've set up keytabs, set up /etc/rndc.key, set Dynamic update to True and put the following in my BIND update policy: grant

Re: [Freeipa-users] Dynamic DNS

2013-04-30 Thread Lynn Root
Hi Guy! I've been working with this recently - maybe I can help. Have you enrolled the ipadevmstr.collmedia.net as a service with `ipa service-add DNS/ipadevmstr.collmedia.net`? On the client, can you `kinit -kt $dnskeytab -p DNS/ipadevmstr.collmedia.net` just fine? You'll have to kinit

[Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
Anyone have any suggestions to using the auto member function in IPA? I've tried to set it up so if a server is enrolled by a user called build then it should add it to a specific server group. I put in an inclusive rule and the expression is just build, but it doesn't work. Do I need to

[Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Simon Williams
Hi I don't know if anyone has tried what I want to do, I really just want to know if it's possible at the moment. A few pointers to any information would be helpful too! I have an existing FreeIPA server running on a CentOS machine. It is used to authenticate all users on the network. This works

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Simon Williams wrote: Hi I don't know if anyone has tried what I want to do, I really just want to know if it's possible at the moment. A few pointers to any information would be helpful too! Short answer: not possible right now if by 'Samba 4' you mean Samba AD DC. I

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 9:30 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.commailto:john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: Anyone have any suggestions to using the auto member function in IPA? I've tried to set it up so if a server is enrolled by a user called build then it should add it to a

Re: [Freeipa-users] Dynamic DNS

2013-04-30 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 12:08 -0400, Guy Matz wrote: hi! Anyone out there gotten Dynamic DNS freeipa-managed DNS server? I've been trying for days following instructions from various freeipa and redhat docs! I've set up keytabs, set up /etc/rndc.key, set Dynamic update to True and put the

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
Yep, enrolledby is what I'm using, but I have been adding them manually since it hasn't been working. Thanks, _ John Moyer On Apr 30, 2013, at 1:21 PM, JR Aquino jr.aqu...@citrix.com wrote: On Apr 30, 2013, at 9:30 AM, John Moyer

[Freeipa-users] Upgrade Test Case

2013-04-30 Thread Dean Hunter
I have a small FreeIPA 3.1 installation on Fedora 18. I thought it might be useful to try to upgrade it to FreeIPA 3.2 on Fedora 19 before I tried to rebuild it from scratch, as I imagined larger installations would not be able to rebuild. I thought the test cases for FreeIPA Test Day might have

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
One thing to add is that this build user only has the following access: Host Administrators Host enrollment Would he need more access to do the membership? My original thought was that technically the user is not doing the addition to the group it's the system technically doing it so there

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:43 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: One thing to add is that this build user only has the following access: Host Administrators Host enrollment Would he need more access to do the membership? My original thought was that technically the

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
Not a problem, here is the output ipa automember-find --type=hostgroup --- 1 rules matched --- Automember Rule: test-group Inclusive Regex: enrolledby=build Number of entries returned 1 Thanks,

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread Nathan Kinder
On 04/30/2013 10:48 AM, JR Aquino wrote: On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:43 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: One thing to add is that this build user only has the following access: Host Administrators Host enrollment Would he need more access to do the membership? My original

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:52 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: Not a problem, here is the output ipa automember-find --type=hostgroup --- 1 rules matched --- Automember Rule: test-group Inclusive Regex: enrolledby=build

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
It comes back with a ton of stuff the row you are probably interested in is this one: enrolledby: uid=build,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com Thanks, _ John Moyer On Apr 30, 2013, at 1:57 PM, JR Aquino jr.aqu...@citrix.com wrote: On

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:02 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: It comes back with a ton of stuff the row you are probably interested in is this one: enrolledby: uid=build,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com Bingo! Ok, try to adjust your automember rule. Delete your

Re: [Freeipa-users] Upgrade Test Case

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Dean Hunter wrote: I have a small FreeIPA 3.1 installation on Fedora 18. I thought it might be useful to try to upgrade it to FreeIPA 3.2 on Fedora 19 before I tried to rebuild it from scratch, as I imagined larger installations would not be able to rebuild. I thought the

Re: [Freeipa-users] Upgrade Test Case

2013-04-30 Thread Rob Crittenden
Dean Hunter wrote: I have a small FreeIPA 3.1 installation on Fedora 18. I thought it might be useful to try to upgrade it to FreeIPA 3.2 on Fedora 19 before I tried to rebuild it from scratch, as I imagined larger installations would not be able to rebuild. I thought the test cases for FreeIPA

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
I tried adding it in addition to the current rule and that didn't work. I then deleted the old rule to only leave the rule with the full name (uid=build,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com) and that didn't work either. This is the new output of that command you had me run earlier: ipa

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:12 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: I tried adding it in addition to the current rule and that didn't work. I then deleted the old rule to only leave the rule with the full name (uid=build,cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=com) and that didn't

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread simon.williams
That is actually pretty good news. The real requirement is network storage for the Windows workstations secured by FreeIPA authentication. If I read what you’ve said correctly this is possible now. I can live with the magical incantations to enrol any new Windows machines for now. There are

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:23 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: Ha! I tried .*build and build.* before contacting you guys, I didn't try .*build.* That worked, it automatically added the machine to the group! Thanks! That will save me s much time! Not a

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/30/2013 02:17 PM, JR Aquino wrote: On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:12 AM, John Moyer john.mo...@digitalreasoning.com wrote: I tried adding it in addition to the current rule and that didn't work. I then deleted the old rule to only leave the rule with the full name

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, simon.willi...@thehelpfulcat.com wrote: That is actually pretty good news. The real requirement is network storage for the Windows workstations secured by FreeIPA authentication. If I read what you’ve said correctly this is possible now. I can live with the magical

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, simon.willi...@thehelpfulcat.com wrote: That is actually pretty good news. The real requirement is network storage for the Windows workstations secured by FreeIPA authentication. If I read what you’ve said correctly this is

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread John Moyer
So I must have looked at the wrong server name, I just tried to add 4 more servers and none of them worked. Anymore ideas? The target is specified by the rule name test-group is the target. Thanks, _ John Moyer On Apr 30, 2013, at

Re: [Freeipa-users] automember issues

2013-04-30 Thread JR Aquino
I've got about 30mins before I get into my next meeting. Are you able to hop into IRC in Freenode to work in realtime on #freeipa? Keeping your head in the cloud ~ Jr Aquino | Sr. Information Security Specialist GXPN | GIAC Exploit Researcher and Advanced

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, simon.willi...@thehelpfulcat.com wrote: That is actually pretty good news. The real requirement is network storage for the Windows workstations secured by FreeIPA authentication.

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Simon Williams
Thanks for all your help. I'll give it a go and see how far I get. On 30 Apr 2013 19:37, Alexander Bokovoy aboko...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, simon.williams@thehelpfulcat.**comsimon.willi...@thehelpfulcat.comwrote: That is actually pretty good news. The real requirement is

Re: [Freeipa-users] Samba 4 with IPA

2013-04-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Simo Sorce wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 22:37 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: We need to add some smart logic to ipasam module to handle it. The logic for trusted users needs to go into winbindd or sssd, ipasam is only about our own domain. In SSSD 1.10 there is new SID