Re: [Freeipa-users] odd cron behaviour

2012-06-15 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
On 06/15/2012 04:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:19 +0200, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: Hi, I've seen cron jobs on some of our machines not being run after they we're migrated to IPA. The machines in question has not been restarted after they we're migrated from NIS to IPA. T

Re: [Freeipa-users] odd cron behaviour

2012-06-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:19 +0200, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: > Hi, > > I've seen cron jobs on some of our machines not being run after they we're > migrated to IPA. The > machines in question has not been restarted after they we're migrated from > NIS to IPA. > > These are RHEL 6 machines. The users

[Freeipa-users] odd cron behaviour

2012-06-15 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, I've seen cron jobs on some of our machines not being run after they we're migrated to IPA. The machines in question has not been restarted after they we're migrated from NIS to IPA. These are RHEL 6 machines. The users that has the crontab that's not run, was in NIS, and the same account

Re: [Freeipa-users] kerberos principals for service accounts (cn=etc, cn=sysaccounts)

2012-06-15 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 00:10 -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > Is it possible for accounts in cn=etc,cn=sysaccounts to have kerberos > principals or must you use the cn=accounts,cn=users container? I'm > thinking this for script-authenticated machine accounts (might be of > form user-hostname@REALM or

[Freeipa-users] kerberos principals for service accounts (cn=etc, cn=sysaccounts)

2012-06-15 Thread Stephen Ingram
Is it possible for accounts in cn=etc,cn=sysaccounts to have kerberos principals or must you use the cn=accounts,cn=users container? I'm thinking this for script-authenticated machine accounts (might be of form user-hostname@REALM or user/hostname@REALM) that need to authenticate to another machine