Re: [Freeipa-users] Extending schema

2011-10-14 Thread Jenny Galipeau


- Original Message -
 On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:44 +0200, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
  Hi,
  
  What is your recommendations for avoiding incompatability with
  future upgrades of IPA if extending
  the dirsrv schema and adding custom objects to the LDAP server is
  required? What considerations
  and precautions should be taken?
  
  Such as adding RBAC support for Solaris clients...
 
 Additional schema is unlikely to cause issues if it does not conflict
 with standard schema. We also tend to prefix all the
 attributes/objectlasses we create for FreeIPA so name clashes are
 unlikely.
 If it is custom schema I suggest you to prefix names appropriately
 too,
 so you have your own 'namespace'.
 
 As for placement I suggest you put this data in a separate container
 from standard FreeIPA stuff for new objects.
 
 In the base DN create a container named something like your company
 name
 or ticker: cn=ACME,suffix and put all your customized entries
 there.
 
 Attaching additional data to users is not a big deal for custom
 schema.
 If it is not custom schema but standard schema not currently used by
 FreeIPA I would be a little bit more careful as a following version
 of
 FreeIPA might conceivably start using those attributes, and there is
 generally enough space to use them in a sort of 'incompatible' way.
 
 But don't let that stop you if you really need it.

Please note that when adding additional objectclasses to users and/or group etc 
... if there are required attributes in the new objectclasses, you will no 
longer be able to add these objects from Web UI and you will not be able to 
define values for the new attributes introduced from the Web UI 
withoutcustomization.  You will have to use the CLI and the --setattr option 
with the command.

~ Jenny

 
 Simo.
 
 --
 Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
 
 ___
 Freeipa-users mailing list
 Freeipa-users@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
 

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


Re: [Freeipa-users] [Fwd: RHN Errata Alert: ipa-client bug fix update]

2011-09-15 Thread Jenny Galipeau


- Original Message -
 - Original Message -
  Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
   I have received this errata for RHEL5, but not RHEL6. Has the
   issue
   been fixed in RHEL 6 as well?
 
  It is going through testing now, I can't provide an ETA.
 
 It has finished testing and has been pushed live. It should be
 available soon!

Sorry was mistaken it is still being tested but we are hoping to push the fix 
today.  So stay tuned.

 Thanks
 Jenny
 
 
  rob
 
  
  
  
  
   Rgds,
   Siggi
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Red Hat Network Alert [mailto:dev-n...@rhn.redhat.com]
   Sent: 15. september 2011 09:58
   To: Sigbjørn Lie
   Subject: RHN Errata Alert: ipa-client bug fix update
  
   Red Hat Network has determined that the following advisory is
   applicable to
   one or more of the systems you have registered:
  
   Complete information about this errata can be found at the
   following
   location:
 https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/errata/details/Details.do?eid=12202
  
   Bug Fix Advisory - RHBA-2011:1290-1
   --
   Summary:
   ipa-client bug fix update
  
   An updated ipa-client package that fixes one bug is now available
   for Red Hat
   Enterprise Linux 5.
  
  
   Description:
   IPA (Identity, Policy, Audit) is an integrated solution to provide
   centrally
   managed identity, that is, machine, user, virtual machines,
   groups,
   and
   authentication credentials. The ipa-client package provides a tool
   to enroll a
   machine to an IPA version 2 server.
  
   This update fixes the following bug:
  
   * Prior to this update, GSSAPI credential delegation was disabled
   in
   the curl
   utility due to a security issue. As a result, applications that
   rely
   on
   delegation did not work properly. This update utilizes a new
   constructor
   argument in the xmlrpc-c client API to set the new
   CURLOPT_GSSAPI_DELEGATION
   curl option. This option enables the credential delegation, thus
   fixing this
   bug. (BZ#736658)
  
   Users of ipa-client are advised to upgrade to this updated
   package,
   which fixes
   this bug.
  
  
  
   ___
   Freeipa-users mailing list
   Freeipa-users@redhat.com
   https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
 
  ___
  Freeipa-users mailing list
  Freeipa-users@redhat.com
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
 
 --
 Looking to carve out IT costs?
 www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
 
 Jenny Galipeau jgali...@redhat.com
 Principal Software QA Engineer
 Red Hat, Inc. Security Engineering
 
 ___
 Freeipa-users mailing list
 Freeipa-users@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

-- 
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/

Jenny Galipeau jgali...@redhat.com
Principal Software QA Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. Security Engineering

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Re: [Freeipa-users] export entire ldap/kerberos/etc onto a new host

2011-02-02 Thread Jenny Galipeau
Thank you Natxo.  We are working hard to get it there and when we do .. 
it will awesome!

Jenny

Natxo Asenjo wrote:

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Ian Stokes-Rees
ijsto...@hkl.hms.harvard.edu wrote:

  

How did you expect anyone to seriously try to use FreeIPA if they
couldn't migrate between versions?  Surely installation and extended use
(weeks/months) by non-developers is part of any beta-testing plan.



If you read the release notes (http://freeipa.org/page/IPAv2_beta), in
the paragraph 'migration' it is quite clearly stated that migration from
v1 to v2 of freeipa is not possible. You are right that it is not
clearly stated that migrations between 1.9.whatever and 2 are not
possible but ...

... as a sysadmin, whenever I read 'alpha|beta', all alarms go off
:-). I do follow the project, but I would never run any kind of
production on it just yet.

I think that blaming redhat for your using a beta version of software in
production is a bit harsh. I understand you are under stress and upset,
but this was not supposed to be running in a production environment. Do
not blame redhat for something that clearly is not their fault.

This project is going to be awesome for unix networks. All the pieces of
the puzzle were out there, but these guys are putting them together in a
nice package. Having dealt with a share of ldap+kerberos environments, I
can tell you this is it. It is not there yet, but it is getting there.

It is your choice to not use it.

--
groeten,
natxo

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users



--
Jenny Galipeau jgali...@redhat.com
Principal Software QA Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. Security Engineering

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ 


___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users