On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 17:10 +0100, bahan w wrote:
> Re !
>
> Thank both of you again for your answers, guys.
>
> Simo, I would be very interested in this feature list in fact.
> Do you know if there is a way to find it ?
> I would really need it, it would help a lot.
You can start from here: htt
Re !
Thank both of you again for your answers, guys.
Simo, I would be very interested in this feature list in fact.
Do you know if there is a way to find it ?
I would really need it, it would help a lot.
Best regards.
Bahan
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 01/13/2016
El mié, 13-01-2016 a las 15:57 +0100, bahan w escribió:
> Re.
>
> Thanks both of you for your answers.
>
> Simo, MIT Kerberos and OpenLDAP can work on their own and provide the
> same kind of service that we want from IPA, even if it is not
> embedded in integrated solution like IPA.
>
> I total
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 15:57 +0100, bahan w wrote:
> Re.
>
> Thanks both of you for your answers.
>
> Simo, MIT Kerberos and OpenLDAP can work on their own and provide the same
> kind of service that we want from IPA, even if it is not embedded in
> integrated solution like IPA.
>
> I totally agr
On 01/13/2016 03:57 PM, bahan w wrote:
> Re.
>
> Thanks both of you for your answers.
>
> Simo, MIT Kerberos and OpenLDAP can work on their own and provide the same
> kind of service that we want from IPA, even if it is not embedded in
> integrated solution like IPA.
>
> I totally agree that IPA
Re.
Thanks both of you for your answers.
Simo, MIT Kerberos and OpenLDAP can work on their own and provide the same
kind of service that we want from IPA, even if it is not embedded in
integrated solution like IPA.
I totally agree that IPA provides a lot of things but I am quite sure the
isolate
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, bahan w wrote:
Hello Simo !
For the reason :
The production team wants to use only the two components openLDAP and MIT
Kerberos, possibily on different servers.
For the explanation :
They want to install only MIT Kerberos and openLDAP.
We already have an existing FreeIPA in
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 15:10 +0100, bahan w wrote:
> Hello Simo !
>
> For the reason :
> The production team wants to use only the two components openLDAP and MIT
> Kerberos, possibily on different servers.
>
> For the explanation :
> They want to install only MIT Kerberos and openLDAP.
> We alrea
Hello Simo !
For the reason :
The production team wants to use only the two components openLDAP and MIT
Kerberos, possibily on different servers.
For the explanation :
They want to install only MIT Kerberos and openLDAP.
We already have an existing FreeIPA installation, with users, groups,
princi
On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 14:54 +0100, bahan w wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I send you this mail because I have a question relative to the migration
> from the IPA distribution to the separate components.
>
> With FreeIPA, we are using only :
> - MIT Kerberos
> - DS389
> - The PKI CA is installed but not use
Hello !
I send you this mail because I have a question relative to the migration
from the IPA distribution to the separate components.
With FreeIPA, we are using only :
- MIT Kerberos
- DS389
- The PKI CA is installed but not used from our side
Is it possible to migrate to the following separate
11 matches
Mail list logo