I did manage to get the 1.0.0 version compiled and running on CentOS 5.6,
using the aforementioned spec file mucking.
But the suggested course would be to wait for CentOS 6.X, change to RHEL 6,
or is Fedora really the only distribution still being targeted?
Cheers,
-Gavin
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011
Hi,
Its no where near a full IdM from what I can see so far but if you want to glue
a straight forward but mixed environment together ie with MS AD and linux and
get one password say across the lot plus some control then it looks good enough.
So if you know what your goals are and want to see
On 04/13/2011 04:18 PM, Gavin McQuillan wrote:
I did manage to get the 1.0.0 version compiled and running on CentOS
5.6, using the aforementioned spec file mucking.
But the suggested course would be to wait for CentOS 6.X, change to
RHEL 6, or is Fedora really the only distribution still
I'd love to Dmitri, but I have a lot on my plate right now.
Ide
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Dmitri Pal d...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/11/2011 02:54 PM, ide4...@gmail.com wrote:
Please how do I enable SCEP in IPA?
Thanks
It is a part of the CS but it is disabled now and not
This question might be better posed on a general directory server
list, however, as ipa obviously contains very sensitive data, I'm
curious as to what ipa users think. Although ipa uses extensive acl's
to shield the most important directory attributes from general view,
it does allow anonymous
On 04/13/2011 08:26 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
This question might be better posed on a general directory server
list, however, as ipa obviously contains very sensitive data, I'm
curious as to what ipa users think. Although ipa uses extensive acl's
to shield the most important directory
On Apr 13, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
This question might be better posed on a general directory server
list, however, as ipa obviously contains very sensitive data, I'm
curious as to what ipa users think. Although ipa uses extensive acl's
to shield the most important directory
