Hi Martin
Thanks a lot for you reply.
We applied the LDIF patch and now we managed to add new zones. Many thanks!!
Yes, you understood well that the DNS zones already had these attributes
defined.
However using the ldapsearch query from the ticket, these attributes did
not show up in the current
On 07/30/2012 03:21 PM, John Blaut wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am following the same issue with Robert.
>
> In /etc/dirsrv/slapd-/schema/99user.ldif we can see that these new
> attributes have been added.
Hello John,
I assume that the new attributes were not added to the MAY list in idnsZone
objectclass
On 07/30/2012 02:57 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 12:11 +0200, Robert Bowell wrote:
>> Hi Simo,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Yes the IPA server has been updated from 2.1 to 2.2. Prior to the
>> update, DNS zones could be created without any issues.
>>
>> I have also noticed
Hi
I am following the same issue with Robert.
In /etc/dirsrv/slapd-/schema/99user.ldif we can see that these new
attributes have been added.
Unfortunately I couldn't verify using ldapsearch on 'cn=schema' to see if
this is indeed the case as well within the LDAP data.
However if I browse other
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 12:11 +0200, Robert Bowell wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Yes the IPA server has been updated from 2.1 to 2.2. Prior to the
> update, DNS zones could be created without any issues.
>
> I have also noticed that the command 'ipa ping' is displaying the
>
Hi Simo,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes the IPA server has been updated from 2.1 to 2.2. Prior to the update,
DNS zones could be created without any issues.
I have also noticed that the command 'ipa ping' is displaying the
incorrect IPA server version (IPA server version 2.1.90.rc1. API version
2.
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:47 +0200, Robert Bowell wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm encountering a strange problem.. upon trying to add a new DNS zone
> the following message is being displayed "attribute
> "idnsAllowTransfer" not allowed" and the DNS entry is not created. Has
> any one ever encountered suc
