[Freeipmi-devel] fish: name conflict
In current Kernel Traffic (posted yesterday) you can read about another program called fish. http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/latest.html -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] not portable - linker error
ab> Ian, Can we get rid of warnings like these? ab> *** Warning: Linking the executable fish against the loadable module ab> *** libfreeipmi.so is not portable! I don't think so, unless we link fish with a static libfreeipmi. One of many problems with libfool + automake. -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Simple IPMI 2.0 test
Al> Just in case anyone is interested, here is a simple C program to see Al> if a remote machine supports IPMI 2.0. Al> Its not dependent on FreeIPMI or any drivers, so its something that Al> can be used quickly without much hassle. Al> I have not actually found an IPMI 2.0 machine that is compliant Al> enough to test if this actually detects IPMI 2.0 properly. But it Al> does spit out a "No go" for definitely non-compliant machines. Does anyone here know if Supermicro E7520/E7525 conforms? -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
[Freeipmi-devel] Re: [Freeipmi-users] report guile version
ab> Please report your GNU Guile version, if you have a working GNU ab> FreeIPMI installation. ab> # guile --version ab> I need this info to freeze the minimum version requirement. Perhaps also the maximum? -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] using gcrypt
Al> Any issues if we switch over to gcrypt for md5, md2, hmac, sha, and Al> all future digest/encryption/etc. in libfreeipmi? What have we been using until now? -- Optimist: We're only two weeks behind schedule. Pessimist: The schedule is a whole two weeks ahead of us. ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] FreeBSD 5.4 / freeipmi 0.1.3 w/ Intel SE7210
> | argp-standalone-1.3 And remove references to getopt. FreeBSD uses > | unistd, which seems to have been detected, but the separate > | references to getopt were not removed - is this a configure bug? > | Sorry I'm not a C coder > | > | grep -r getopt.h * > | vi work/freeipmi-0.1.3/bmc-watchdog/src/bmc-watchdog.c > | vi work/freeipmi-0.1.3/ipmipower/src/ipmipower_config.c > | vi work/freeipmi-0.1.3/libfreeipmi/src/ipmi-ping.c > | > | I just dd'd the #include lines. > ` > I did not know about this issue. GNU Coding Standards recommends argp > library. Currently some tools uses argp library and some getopt. I > think it is better to use argp uniformly through out the code base. We > will take care of this bug in the next release. (Albert can you take > care of this bug?) What does GNU Standard recommend for the case when libc is not glibc? Is there a standalone GNU argp package? ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
