Livermore National Laboratory
- Original Message -
From: Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, November 3, 2005 6:04 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch
> > I am thinking if you should start IPMI-2.0 work in the current
> branch> itself. We can a
ver stuff? I can take a look. Just
point me in the direction of what new API calls/options/whatever aren't
working.
Al
--
Albert Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Original Message -
From: Anand Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, November 3
,[ Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
| Ab, Bala, etc.,
| I'm starting some development in the branch 'al_ipmi_2_0_branch'.
`
I am thinking if you should start IPMI-2.0 work in the current branch
itself. We can always say 2.0 support as experimental. Otherwise you
will still have to go thru t
Ab, Bala, etc.,
I'm starting some development in the branch 'al_ipmi_2_0_branch'.
Al
--
Albert Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
___
Freeipmi-devel mailing list
Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf