Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch

2005-11-04 Thread Albert Chu
Livermore National Laboratory - Original Message - From: Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, November 3, 2005 6:04 pm Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch > > I am thinking if you should start IPMI-2.0 work in the current > branch> itself. We can a

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch

2005-11-03 Thread Albert Chu
ver stuff? I can take a look. Just point me in the direction of what new API calls/options/whatever aren't working. Al -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Original Message - From: Anand Babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, November 3

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch

2005-11-03 Thread Anand Babu
,[ Albert Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] | Ab, Bala, etc., | I'm starting some development in the branch 'al_ipmi_2_0_branch'. ` I am thinking if you should start IPMI-2.0 work in the current branch itself. We can always say 2.0 support as experimental. Otherwise you will still have to go thru t

[Freeipmi-devel] ipmi 2.0 branch

2005-10-31 Thread Albert Chu
Ab, Bala, etc., I'm starting some development in the branch 'al_ipmi_2_0_branch'. Al -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf