Re: [Freeipmi-devel] bmc-config pef checkout
Hi Al, PEF commands give 0x1C completion code on IPMI 2.0 machine. I think, most of IPMI boxes don't have PEF. If possible, can you try Intel proprietary tools to know whether the box supports PEF. Unfortunately I don't have physical access to IPMI machines here Thanks, Bala --- Free as in freedom http://www.gnu.org/ > I know that the scheme version didn't work for me either. I'm more > curious than anything. > > When I was doing the libfreeipmi audit/upgrade (with only 1 ipmi machine) > I just assumed that it didn't support pef. But 3 different machines (3 > different vendors and 3 different ipmi implementations) all not supporting > pef seemed too odd to me. > > Al > >> Al, >> I did not have access to an ipmi2 machine so PEF is _not_ tested. I >> dont know if the bmc-config scheme version was working for you, but the >> C version uses the same API which the scheme one was using. >> >> avati >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:26:35AM -0700, Albert Chu wrote: >>> Out of my curiosity, has this been verified to work on a machine? >>> >>> I have three IPMI machines, all of which see completion code errors of >>> 0xC1 = Used to indicate an unrecognized or unsupported command. >>> >>> I can't help but think that atleast 1 of my 3 should support PEF. So >>> maybe something is wrong with the code? >>> >>> Al >>> >>> -- >>> Albert Chu >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> 925-422-5311 >>> Computer Scientist >>> High Performance Systems Division >>> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Freeipmi-devel mailing list >>> Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel >>> >> > > > -- > Albert Chu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925-422-5311 > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > ___ > Freeipmi-devel mailing list > Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel > > ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] bmc-config pef checkout
I know that the scheme version didn't work for me either. I'm more curious than anything. When I was doing the libfreeipmi audit/upgrade (with only 1 ipmi machine) I just assumed that it didn't support pef. But 3 different machines (3 different vendors and 3 different ipmi implementations) all not supporting pef seemed too odd to me. Al > Al, > I did not have access to an ipmi2 machine so PEF is _not_ tested. I > dont know if the bmc-config scheme version was working for you, but the > C version uses the same API which the scheme one was using. > > avati > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:26:35AM -0700, Albert Chu wrote: >> Out of my curiosity, has this been verified to work on a machine? >> >> I have three IPMI machines, all of which see completion code errors of >> 0xC1 = Used to indicate an unrecognized or unsupported command. >> >> I can't help but think that atleast 1 of my 3 should support PEF. So >> maybe something is wrong with the code? >> >> Al >> >> -- >> Albert Chu >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 925-422-5311 >> Computer Scientist >> High Performance Systems Division >> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Freeipmi-devel mailing list >> Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel >> > -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 925-422-5311 Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] bmc-config pef checkout
Al, I did not have access to an ipmi2 machine so PEF is _not_ tested. I dont know if the bmc-config scheme version was working for you, but the C version uses the same API which the scheme one was using. avati On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:26:35AM -0700, Albert Chu wrote: > Out of my curiosity, has this been verified to work on a machine? > > I have three IPMI machines, all of which see completion code errors of > 0xC1 = Used to indicate an unrecognized or unsupported command. > > I can't help but think that atleast 1 of my 3 should support PEF. So > maybe something is wrong with the code? > > Al > > -- > Albert Chu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925-422-5311 > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > ___ > Freeipmi-devel mailing list > Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel > ___ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
