[Freeipmi-users] authentication type unavailable for attempted privilege level with Intel S5000PAL Mainboard

Dear freeipmi users/developers, I'm trying to monitor an Intel SR2500 server (this server has the Intel S5000PAL mainboard in it). While I can monitor it using ipmitool, I keep getting errors with ipmimonitoring from freeipmi. Also using the -W parameter for workarounds (as described in the

Re: [Freeipmi-users] authentication type unavailable for attempted privilege level with Intel S5000PAL Mainboard

' workaround to also encompass this case and post a beta tar.gz for you to check out. Al On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:58 +0200, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, thanks for your fast answer. Below you find the requested debug output. I'm using version 0.7.11. The authcap

Re: [Freeipmi-users] authentication type unavailable for attempted privilege level with Intel S5000PAL Mainboard

/No OEM_Enable_Auth_Type_Straight_PasswordNo EndSection [r...@tpw ~]# If you need any further results, just let me know! Thanks for your support, Werner Thanks, Al On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 15:31 +0200, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, thanks for the updated tar.gz. I tried

Re: [Freeipmi-users] authentication type unavailable for attempted privilege level with Intel S5000PAL Mainboard

trying ipmimonitoring with the -l admin, to tell ipmimonitoring to use the admin privilege level. Out of my curiosity, did the Intel motherboard come like this by default? Al On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 12:18 +0200, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, sorry for my late reply. Now I'm back

[Freeipmi-users] request: status info for discrete sensors for monitoring purposes

that doesn't exist is N/A. There is also a Warning output when the situation is appropriate. I can speak more of it, but it's probably not best on this mailing. Feel free to ping me on the FreeIPMI mailing list. Al On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 06:08 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi ipmitool

Re: [Freeipmi-users] request: status info for discrete sensors for monitoring purposes

use 0.7.15-2 which ships with Ubuntu 10.04 On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 04:16 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, ipmimonitoring seems to be very useful for my needs. I gave it a try with an Intel SR2500 server. I unplugged one power chord from Power Supply 1 (PS1) and removed the cover

Re: [Freeipmi-users] request: status info for discrete sensors for monitoring purposes

something in this area, I'll let you know on the mailinglist. Do you have a approximate time plan when you expect version 0.9.1? Thanks and best regards from Austria, Werner Al -- : Werner Fischer : Technology Specialist : Thomas-Krenn.AG | Speed is (y)our success : http://www.thomas

[Freeipmi-users] querying sensors of Intel SE7210TP1-E board fails with ipmi_sdr_cache_create: internal IPMI error

with FreeIPMI? Best regards, Werner -- : Werner Fischer : Technology Specialist : Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts : http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas-krenn.com/wiki ___ Freeipmi-users mailing list Freeipmi-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

[Freeipmi-users] querying sensors of Intel SE7210TP1-E board fails with ipmi_sdr_cache_create: internal IPMI error

with FreeIPMI? Best regards, Werner -- : Werner Fischer : Technology Specialist : Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts : http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas-krenn.com/wiki ___ Freeipmi-users mailing list Freeipmi-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: [Freeipmi-users] Intel SR 1625 Sensors

that should support those sensor interpretations. It's tough for me to test w/o your motherboard in front of me, PLMK if it works for you. http://download.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-1.0.4.beta0.tar.gz Al On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 03:51 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, (sorry

[Freeipmi-users] possible causes for ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

: for the SR1625 question I got know feedback yet. I assume that the new beta works, but this customer can tell me for sure in about two weeks (than he can test the current beta) -- : Werner Fischer : Technology Specialist : Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts : http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http

Re: [Freeipmi-users] possible causes for ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

many IPMI requests to handle and can't handle all of them. That's the scenario I've personally seen them the most on. Al On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 02:15 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote: Hi Al, one of our customers monitors his Supermicro servers with FreeIPMI (with both Nagios using

Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi support with HP iLO2 servers initial success!

/freeipmi.conf -g Temperature --quiet-cache --sdr-cache-recreate does anybody know what this error message means?? best regards john s. -- : Werner Fischer : Technology Specialist : Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts : http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas

Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi_ctx_open_outofband_2_0: bad completion code (Supermicro X9DR7-LN4F, firmware 3.40)

Hi Al, On Mit, 2016-06-08 at 10:22 -0700, Albert Chu wrote: > Hey Werner, > > Thanks for the report, it appears there was a bug in FreeIPMI that would > have made the bug easier to understand. > [...] So I'll need to fix that. I've pushed this into the > freeipmi-1-5-0-stable branch if you

Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi_ctx_open_outofband_2_0: bad completion code (Supermicro X9DR7-LN4F, firmware 3.40)

Hi Al, On Mit, 2016-06-15 at 15:34 +, Chu, Al wrote: > Hi Werner, > > > PS: he also told me that he is using CentOS 6 with freeipmi-1.2.1-7. > Do > > you think that the problem could be also somehow come from this > older > > version? > > It's hard to say definitively since that was so long

Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi_ctx_open_outofband_2_0: bad completion code (Supermicro X9DR7-LN4F, firmware 3.40)

Hi Al, after further testing the admin found the root cause: whenever he uploads a new firmware, he does not preserve any settings. Instead, he chooses factory defaults and sets afterwards the setting using an configuration file of bmc-config. Now it turned out, that with firmware 3.40 setting