Re: [Freenet-dev] MediaEnforcer and GPL

2000-12-26 Thread Timm Murray
Do their programs require Java? Given, it could be done with a native-code compiler, or ported to C++. I haven't checked their web page yet, but are they having uber-corperations pay for them to scan for infringing content? If so, the software is only used internaly and would not be required to

Re: [Freenet-dev] MediaEnforcer and GPL

2000-12-25 Thread Mr . Bad
> "SH" == Steven Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm just a little skeptical that these guys could get a working >> product up without -any- Fred code in it fast enough to make >> these press statements. If it -did- have Fred code in it, I >> believe that they'd have to p

Re: [Freenet-dev] MediaEnforcer and GPL

2000-12-25 Thread Adam Langley
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:00:18PM -0800, Mr . Bad wrote: > there (liberator & freenetlib.py are back at 0.2, right? and whiterose > and nfreenetd are still struggling). Heh, just spent days writing a nice new DataStore only for gcc to say: store.hh:184: sorry, not implemented: testing field_decl

Re: [Freenet-dev] MediaEnforcer and GPL

2000-12-25 Thread Steven Hazel
"Mr.Bad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm just a little skeptical that these guys could get a working > product up without -any- Fred code in it fast enough to make these > press statements. If it -did- have Fred code in it, I believe that > they'd have to put it under GPL -- since Fred is GPL a

Re: [Freenet-dev] MediaEnforcer and GPL

2000-12-24 Thread Travis Bemann
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 10:00:18PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote: > One question I just thought of: I was wondering what the chances are > that the guys who do MediaEnforcer actually developed their own > software to talk to nodes. > > http://www.mediaenforcer.com/ > > AFAIK, Fred is the only wor