I hate to bring it up again; however, the last message never received a
response and this issue does seem to be an issue which has been reported
quite a few times in the past, and never recieved a valid response or fix
as yet to date.
Please see message dated: 11/29/01 Re: Realm
And I actually tend to think that there's something more here than just
paying attention to the detailfile directive - since I don't see a Realm
attribute in the detail file for the users that are using a realm (if there
was no realm on the username I DO see 'Realm = NULL') and I don't get any
At 10:10 AM 12/5/2001 -0800, Douglas Brick wrote:
Sorry if I'm reiterating an old question, but radwho isn't working for
me. I'm using freeradius v0.2
Very old version. I'd strongly suggest upgrading to one of the nightly
CVS snapshot builds, or at the very least, to 0.3.
on redhat 7.0,
Nathan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The primary issue _not_ being where to log standard detail files, but where
it logs proxied detail files. The issue appears that the line in proxy.conf
detailfile += /path/to/detail is being ignored.
Agreed. That line isn't used *anywhere*. It
On Wednesday, 5 December 2001, at 12:19:05, Chris Parker wrote:
At 10:10 AM 12/5/2001 -0800, Douglas Brick wrote:
Sorry if I'm reiterating an old question, but radwho isn't working
for me. I'm using freeradius v0.2
Very old version. I'd strongly suggest upgrading to one of the
On Thursday, 6 December 2001, at 09:26:27, Matthew Wallis wrote:
At 10:10 AM 12/5/2001 -0800, Douglas Brick wrote:
Sorry if I'm reiterating an old question, but radwho isn't working
for me. I'm using freeradius v0.2
What you might want to do is check, using something like strace,
Hi, I have installed cistron radius on linux system. I have configured the /etc/raddb/clients file and also the /etc/raddb/users file. I have added the following enty in the /etc/raddb/users fileuser_name Auth-Type = Local, Password = "123456" Service-Type = Framed-User, Framed-Protocol = PPPBut
