Je le savais : j'aurai dû apprendre le C;)
Alan DeKok a écrit :
L.C. (Laurentiu C. Badea) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two issues I noticed while looking at the source for my problem: in
threads.c I believe it would be safer to end the fork_mutex critical
section after the forkers structure is
Hello,
I wanne change in the dialup_admin the Personal Information page fields.
I now i can change in the admin.conf the user-info tabelname.
But how can i change the tabel fields, i can change the the user_info.php3.
But i thing there is a better solutions for this, but i don't now how?
Thank
Hi,
E. Dean Sahutske [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to compilethe source. I ran ./configure --without-rlm_krb5
--without-rlm_x99_token (there was a problem with that too). What ist
lost by not having these features enabled? When does freeradius require
kerberos?
When you
Hello everyone,
Some of the authentication requests are proxied and come back with a
wrong vlan id. I try to rewrite the attribute Tunnel-Private-Group-Id,
but I can't get it to work.
this is how answer from the proxy server on which the user is known
looks like:
rad_recv: Access-Accept
I have a radius box set up using 1.0.1. Currently it is doing
authentication and working fine. I am trying to integrate in 802.1x
auth. I have the EAP-TTLS w/ PAP working fine with a users entry of
username User-Password == test, but I am confused how the users
and authorize and authenticate
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Michel van Dop wrote:
Hello,
I wanne change in the dialup_admin the Personal Information page fields.
I now i can change in the admin.conf the user-info tabelname.
But how can i change the tabel fields, i can change the the user_info.php3.
But i thing there is a better
Hi,
I have a radius server currently authenticating dialup users using Cistron.
I'm in the process of switching over to Free radius. I have downloaded and
installed Free radius 1.0.1 and have edited radiusd.conf to suit my needs. I
haven't started using it yet in place of Cistron but I'm about
Hi,
There are multiple libraries which implement kerberos. On FreeBSD,
I think you'll have to give an extra option to 'configure':
$ configure --enable-heimdal-krb5
thanks! - i'll follow this up.
and it should make the kerberos module use the right kerberos libraries.
But isn't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan DeKok writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a similar issue with rlm_krb5 on a FreeBSD 5.3 box.
I have FreeRADIUS working 100% fine with kerberos etc on a Fedora Core 2 bo
x
(home compiled too - although I started the experiment with an RPM)
EAP is in both the authenticate and authorize sections. I still have
not gotten it to work, today I am trying several different
permutations of the users file.
- Joe
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:44:20 -0500 (EST), Dustin Doris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a radius box set up using 1.0.1.
I arrived at the point where I thought it would be a good idea to go
ahead and purchase a certifcate for my radius server rather than just
using myself as the authority, and I somehow botched it and radius will
not work. I have my guess as to what I did wrong, but to be sure can
anyone fire back
If you are still failing, I would suggest you send the list a copy of your
radiusd.conf file and the output of radiusd -X when it fails. The debug
messages when it does fail, should be able to tell you why it is failing.
Without the debug info, we can only guess.
-Dusty Doris
On Thu, 16 Dec
Hi,
$ configure --enable-heimdal-krb5
and it should make the kerberos module use the right kerberos libraries.
I just dealt with this issue a couple of weeks ago. The heimdal config
switch didn't work (can't remember why), but I was able to get it to
when I try the heimdal
I must have missed that one. I'll take another look. Thanks for being
patient with me.
--- Julius Igugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dialup Admin.
It's bundled with freeradius.
--- tekchip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an administration application, possibly a web based one
that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
:
I just dealt with this issue a couple of weeks ago. The heimdal config
switch didn't work (can't remember why), but I was able to get it to
when I try the heimdal configure option, I get past the krb5_auth stuff, but
then the
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:12:59AM +, Santiago Balaguer García wrote:
The action you proposed is create a new attribute, for instance,
Exec-Program-End, and insert in the radreply table. For example, if I have
this entries in this table:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:34:21PM +0100, Alfred H. Dahl wrote:
we have a problem with our IP-POOL.
We run pppoe-servers from Mikrotik, and we assign IP to the client
using freeradius 0.9.3.
If a Mikrotik pppoe-server stops, or the accounting-stop-packet from
the pppoe-server does
I'm home sick today. Please call 608-868-9570 for urgent issues.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Sven Juergensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after some research i found out that someone fixed this with the
--without-rlm_x99_token
That should be fixed, but the maintainer of the module hasn't been
actively involved in the project for a while.
it compiles but gives me a segfault once
thanks alan,
here goes the backtrace then:
clt173:/install/freeradius-1.0.1# gdb /usr/local/sbin/radiusd core
GNU gdb 6.1-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies
and again,
http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
configuring with --disable-shared make halts
at the message of my first email, something with
the rlm_x99_token.
some strace output:
[..]
write(1, gtc: challenge = \Password: \\n, 31 gtc: challenge = Password:
) = 31
time(NULL)
I found that SIGCHLD can be delivered to the parent even while it's still
blocked. It makes no sense but I am pretty sure that's what's happening. If
the child finishes fast enough, the parent does the signal handler before
getting to create the forker entry, so later on it blocks on sem_wait
It seems no response to the question that I post about mschapv2 not
Working. But I've made some progress myself and got another problem.
The winbind and ntlm problem is solved. When I copy the
ntlm_auth statement to command line, it could successfully return a
NT_KEY.
According to the
I'm home sick today. Please call 608-868-9570 for urgent issues.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I'm home sick today. Please call 608-868-9570 for urgent issues.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
The action you proposed is create a new attribute, for instance,
Exec-Program-End, and insert in the radreply table. For example, if I have
this entries in this table:
+-+--+---++--+
| id | UserName | Attribute | op | Value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a similar issue with rlm_krb5 on a FreeBSD 5.3 box.
I have FreeRADIUS working 100% fine with kerberos etc on a Fedora Core 2 box
(home compiled too - although I started the experiment with an RPM)
There are multiple libraries which implement kerberos.
Is there an administration application, possibly a web based one that
will do the administration of radius and through radius the back end
user dbase or is the best bet to pick a management application that
connects directly to the back end? For example I'm planning to use
freeradius with mysql.
Dialup Admin.
It's bundled with freeradius.
--- tekchip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an administration application, possibly a web based one that
will do the administration of radius and through radius the back end
user dbase or is the best bet to pick a management application that
Hi, i need help to configure freeradius + asterisk (PBX)
is anybody in this list that can help me?
Thank you
Carlos.-
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
we have a problem with our IP-POOL.
We run pppoe-servers from Mikrotik, and we assign IP to the client
using freeradius 0.9.3.
If a Mikrotik pppoe-server stops, or the accounting-stop-packet from
the pppoe-server does not reach the radius-server, the IP-address is
not freed from the
Alfred H. Dahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do know, that of the 900 or so IP's marked as active in my IPPool,
only 600+ are actually IN USE. This disturbs me.
I have upgraded to version 1.0.1, but the behaviour is the same.
It seems like the IP's are still not freed after a client disconnects.
hello people,
tried compiling the 1.0.1 freeradius on a debian woody.
the apt-package won't work, because it's missing the
'--disable-shared' configure parameter. if that one is
omitted i'm getting an error that crashes radiusd -X:
rlm_eap: Failed to link EAP-Type/tls: rlm_eap_tls.so: cannot open
ADAM WANNINGER wrote:
I'm home sick today. Please call 608-868-9570 for urgent issues.
LOL
--
Regards,
Thor Spruyt
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.thor-spruyt.com
M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65
Bestel nu uw exemplaar van Operationele verkoop (Walter Spruyt -
Liesbeth Huysmans) via www.salesguide.be Ontdek de
34 matches
Mail list logo