hey thanks! that did it.
From: Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudba...@freeradius.org
To: Det Det det.explo...@yahoo.com; FreeRadius users mailing list
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Stop Logging in radpostauth
] returns noop
# Executing section accounting from file
/etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/default
+- entering group accounting {...}
[detail]expand:
/var/log/freeradius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/detail-%Y%m%d -
/var/log/freeradius/radacct/192.168.1.7/detail-20111025
[detail] /var/log/freeradius
I have check that I had not defined the pool as acct_pool, for this reason
server's type was wrong.
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Why-is-not-writting-in-second-detail-file-tp4935451p4935604.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at
On 2011/10/24 09:06 PM, Jennyanydots Napoleon Shoehorn wrote:
OH! I've looked too many lines of code over the last week.
I have no idea how to patch but will investigate. Was thinking we might have
to use nas-id instead.
The ultimate intention was to use the mac address of the nas and a
Hi all,
I have a configuration with 2 wifi instances :
* default inner-tunnel for internal users
* partners partners.inner-eap for partners users.
for internal user, I have an eap.conf for outer and inner.eap.conf for inner
for partners, I have a partners.eap. with eap partners.eap
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, tonimanel
antoniofernan...@fabergames.com wrote:
Yes, I knew that code is to define a reader. Thanks. ;)
I think that this function incorrectly (I have some mistake) because when I
list /var/log/freeradius/radacct, not appears second_detail file.
Did you read
Thanks for your answer.
I hadn't put update control inside accounting. Now, accounting packets are
write, but with different time in acctstarttime and acctstoptime fields.
This fields should to have the same values (I would like to get this).
--
View this message in context:
I have got the same result writting update control inside of preacct. This
is proxy configuration, but I don't want a proxy configuration, I would like
to get a copy-acct-to-home-server configuration with the same set of
information in radacct table. I have configured proxy.conf because in
hi all!
how do i update RAD_REPLY correctly with perl if i want to add addtiotional
Cisco-AVPair in reply?
lets say user profile has Cisco-AVPair=something1. I can have multiple of
those by adding to user profile another pair like this
Cisco-AVPair+=something1. But how to do the same while
On 25/10/11 10:54, Fred wrote:
rlm_eap: SSL error error:140DB111:SSL
routines:SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context:ssl session id context too
long
Ugh. OpenSSL really is a horrible, horrible piece of software.
Are you sure there is absolutely no other change than going from 2.1.11
to 2.1.12 -
Hi,
I want to install freeradius on RHEL5.
I downloaded tar.bz2.(version 2.1.12)
Run *rpmbuild -ba freeradius.spec*, but get an error:
.
.
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
?? ?(?) (?):
On 25/10/11 12:37, Victor Guk wrote:
Hi,
I want to install freeradius on RHEL5.
I downloaded tar.bz2.(version 2.1.12)
Run *rpmbuild -ba freeradius.spec*, but get an error:
There are freeradius2 RPMs in the RHEL channels.
I suggest you either:
a. Install one of those, or
b. Download the
Phil Mayers wrote:
Ugh. OpenSSL really is a horrible, horrible piece of software.
Yup.
I'll roll a patch up for the underlying issue. It's odd that no-one else
is seeing it though.
I've taken your fix from github and added it to v2.1.x master branches.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Energ po...@ponch.ru writes:
how do i update RAD_REPLY correctly with perl if i want to add addtiotional
Cisco-AVPair in reply?
lets say user profile has Cisco-AVPair=something1. I can have multiple of
those by adding to user profile another pair like this
Cisco-AVPair+=something1. But how
On 10/25/2011 07:47 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 25/10/11 12:37, Victor Guk wrote:
Hi,
I want to install freeradius on RHEL5.
I downloaded tar.bz2.(version 2.1.12)
Run *rpmbuild -ba freeradius.spec*, but get an error:
There are freeradius2 RPMs in the RHEL channels.
I suggest you either:
a.
Hi,
The spec is a bit buggy, I had to make some tweaks to make it work
(minor tweaks). Let me know if you would like to have them. We are
maintaining the latest RPMs (core,perl,mysql,utils) in our PacketFence
repositories for RHEL5 and RHEL6, if you want...
Hi Alan,
While waiting for a fix on github, (I will not be able to rebuild my
servers today) I try to make a workaround, as due to this SSL problem,
I cannot have anymore
default eap config including virtual_server = inner-tunnel
partners eap config including some virtual_server =
Thank you, Bjørn Mork!
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/update-RAD-REPLY-with-in-rlm-perl-tp4935794p4936231.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 25/10/11 14:25, Fred wrote:
Hi Alan,
While waiting for a fix on github, (I will not be able to rebuild my
servers today) I try to make a workaround, as due to this SSL problem,
I cannot have anymore
As per my email - there are other options.
You can make your EAP module name shorter; or
:
# echo Message-Authenticator = 0x00 | radclient 127.0.0.1 acct
testing123 -c 250 temp wc -l temp wc -l
/var/log/freeradius/radacct/127.0.0.1/detail-20111025
250 temp
84224 /var/log/freeradius/radacct/127.0.0.1/detail-20111025
This only happen when using FreeRadius in Multithread
I have got the same result writting update control inside of preacct. This
is proxy configuration, but I don't want a proxy configuration, I would like
to get a copy-acct-to-home-server configuration with the same set of
information in radacct table. I have configured proxy.conf because in
Pierre Rondou wrote:
The problem is that the server seems to lose accounting packets in
Multithread mode
It's possible that you're simply sending packets too fast. If the
server doesn't read them from the socket quickly enough, the kernel will
simply discard them.
Logging with module
Hello Alan,
See answers inline
Regards,
Pierre
Alan DeKok a écrit :
Pierre Rondou wrote:
The problem is that the server seems to lose accounting packets in
Multithread mode
It's possible that you're simply sending packets too fast. If the
server doesn't read them from the socket
I am trying to configure free radius with multiple ROOT CA's. This is not a products environment it is purely a test environment. We need the ability to test out products against freeradius and other radius servers. using multiple different certificate sizes and ROOT CA's.
I currently have the
Hi Phil,
Unfortunately, shortening eap module instance name to eap2 seems to
give same result.
Best regards,
Fred
2011/10/25 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk:
On 25/10/11 14:25, Fred wrote:
Hi Alan,
While waiting for a fix on github, (I will not be able to rebuild my
servers today) I try
radiusd -X follows :
FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.12, for host x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu, built on
Sep 27 2011 at 11:59:05
Copyright (C) 1999-2009 The FreeRADIUS server project and contributors.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
You may
Pierre Rondou wrote:
It's possible that you're simply sending packets too fast. If the
server doesn't read them from the socket quickly enough, the kernel will
simply discard them.
Well, then, why is this only happening in the multi-thread mode? If it
was a kernel issue, wouldn't it
Fred wrote:
Hi Phil,
Unfortunately, shortening eap module instance name to eap2 seems to
give same result.
See http://git.freeradius.org/
Grab the v2.1.x branch. It should work.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Kris Armstrong wrote:
I am trying to configure free radius with multiple ROOT CA's. This is
not a products environment it is purely a test environment. We need the
ability to test out products against freeradius and other radius
servers. using multiple different certificate sizes and ROOT
On 25/10/11 16:10, Fred wrote:
cache {
enable = no
lifetime = 6
max_entries = 8192
name = A
}
}
rlm_eap: SSL error error:140DB111:SSL
routines:SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context:ssl session id context too
long
I don't know why this isn't working. The
Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com writes:
Pierre Rondou wrote:
It's possible that you're simply sending packets too fast. If the
server doesn't read them from the socket quickly enough, the kernel will
simply discard them.
Well, then, why is this only happening in the multi-thread
Bjørn Mork wrote:
File locking problem when multiple threads are attempting to update the
same file?
Maybe... the detail file is marked not thread-safe, which means that
the server core takes care of locking it. i.e. only one thread at a
time will be inside of the detail module.
Alan
Phil,
Yes, I am sure, but I don't have traces on hand...
I will try to get some radiusd -X on 2.1.11 ASAP, as I can't do it now
because I try to find a solution as I have to restart production in
the next few hours ...
Anyway, Thank a lot for your kind help attempts.
Fred
2011/10/25 Phil Mayers
Hi,
I am running 2.1.12 in an attempt to auth Wimax users. However I am
having difficulty defining TLVs for WiMAX-QoS-Descriptor and associated
WiMAX-Packet-Flow-Descriptor
I used a post on the matter in the freeradius mailing list which
suggested something to the effect of:
INSERT INTO
Hi,
I am a newbie to FreeRADIUS and I have run into a problem during the setup.
I have spent some time on researching for an answer online, but I got no
luck. I have described the problem as below. Could anyone please let me
know what went wrong? Thank you so much in advance.
Stephen
OS: Mac
Stephen Kwok wrote:
I am a newbie to FreeRADIUS and I have run into a problem during the
setup. I have spent some time on researching for an answer online, but
I got no luck. I have described the problem as below. Could anyone
please let me know what went wrong? Thank you so much in
James T. Mugauri wrote:
I am running 2.1.12 in an attempt to auth Wimax users. However I am
having difficulty defining TLVs for WiMAX-QoS-Descriptor and associated
WiMAX-Packet-Flow-Descriptor
You just add the attributes, and the server will take care of
encapsulating them in TLVs.
This
On 26 October 2011 04:48, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
If the server is too slow to process requests, the kernel will throw
away the UDP packets. This happens when the server is slow... whether
it's threaded or not.
But then the client won't get the acks and retransmit. If I understood
Andrej andrej.gro...@gmail.com writes:
On 26 October 2011 04:48, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
If the server is too slow to process requests, the kernel will throw
away the UDP packets. This happens when the server is slow... whether
it's threaded or not.
But then the client won't get
Hi,
But then the client won't get the acks and retransmit. If I understood
correctly, then the problem is the packets *are* acked but not logged.
Maybe my whole understanding of UDP is flawed, I thought the whole
point of using UDP instead of TCP is not to have ACKS and retransmits?
at
On 10/25/2011 11:07 AM, Kris Armstrong wrote:
I am trying to configure free radius with multiple ROOT CA's. This is
not a products environment it is purely a test environment. We need the
ability to test out products against freeradius and other radius
servers. using multiple different
Hi,
OS: Mac OSX 10.6.8
FreeRADIUS version:�2.1.12
Steps taken:
snip
okay. so you downloaded the software, extracted it, then built it...
great. did you note what happened when you 'make install' ?
Starting�-�reading�configuration�files�...�
Don't post the same message twice if you just want a faster response.
It's rude. If anything, it'd discourage others from even trying to
help you,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, tonimanel
antoniofernan...@fabergames.com wrote:
I have got the same result writting update control inside of
43 matches
Mail list logo
