In the first instance, upgrade. There is a major security problem with 2.1.x
release. Get 2.2.x onto your system asap.
What are your NAS (cisco controllers) timeouts? Is this box a pure proxy or
does it do authentication too? Have you enabled ciscos status-check system so
it knows the RADIUS
Doesn´t work..
preacct {
preproccess
acct_unique
suffix
sql.authorize
}
accouting {
if (Check-Quota == 1) {
if (Acct-Status-Type == Start) {
onda_startquota
}
elsif (Acct-Status-Type ==
Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) wrote:
I need to track some type of 'user group'. i´m doing this to not
overload my database servers.
Then you need to upgrade your database.
into the radgroupreply table i need to 'create' one attribute like:
Check-Bandwidth := [0,1]
i added this attribute
Hi there,
I'm back at work, and i'll focus myself again for the next few days to
get those packages working.
after commit 2a8c11646b660b0c52eab9fa8e9e8cff3603f262 which move
rlm_ldap to the new config based attribute map, we need to remove
ldap.attrmap from raddb/Makefile and the corresponding
QASIM RAO wrote:
sir i have upgraded my free radius version to freeradius-server 2.2 it
runs fine.. now i change rlm_sql module
of my older version
Why? That makes absolutely no sense.
when i run make command it gives following errors...
You need to understand programming before
Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
My understanding of the above is that
(a) Boilermake seems to work on Ubuntu, no idea why.
Because it's working as designed.
(a) Boilermake is unusable on Debian, so once the old build system is
phased out, package builds will be impossible.
sigh Or, you can
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ include ../Make.inc
#
FILES = acct_users attrs attrs.access_reject attrs.accounting_response \
attrs.pre-proxy clients.conf dictionary templates.conf \
- experimental.conf hints huntgroups ldap.attrmap \
+ experimental.conf hints
Hi,
We're using 2.1.12.
We require a full log of everything that gets sent between a controller and
freeradius.
We've configured detail.log, inner-tunnel and default to log
authentications and replies which work for us, but is there any way to also
log Access-Challenge? I've read some very old
On 12/05/2012 12:53 PM, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) wrote:
Finished request 0.
Going to the next request
Waking up in 4.9 seconds.
rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 192.168.2.200 port 55834,
id=129, length=149
Service-Type = Framed-User
Framed-Protocol = PPP
As
On 05/12/2012 3:44 μ.μ., Alan DeKok wrote:
Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
My understanding of the above is that
(a) Boilermake seems to work on Ubuntu, no idea why.
Because it's working as designed.
Any clue as to what is special about Ubuntu 12.04 that enables
boilermake to work?
The same or
On 05/12/2012 4:57 μ.μ., Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
A fellow DD noted private libraries, as in /usr/lib/freeradius, are not
s/fellow DD/friend, who happens to be a DD/
Minor correction! I am not a Debian developer.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi,
I have set FreeRadius 2.1.12 Server, and configured it to authorize and
authenticate users that are in Active Directory and users file. I have tested
in real wireless environment to authenticate users from Active Directory
users file and it is successful. But according to our
I have one Freeradius server that i need to give to an outsource client of
mine,
the problem is that he is not a very Linux oriented (to put it gently) and
have even less skills in any form of SQL.
he is going to cover some of our tests and some of them are
the accounting side of connected
Hi,
Just wondering if someone can confirm something for me.
The python module only passes the the request attribute list (not the reply,
proxy-reply, control lists) to the python script, is that correct?
Would it be possible to modify the module to pass the remaining lists to the
python code?
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Alan Buxey wrote:
In the first instance, upgrade. There is a major security problem with 2.1.x
release. Get 2.2.x onto your system asap.
This is the RedHat RPM which I believe are maintained by RedHat. Hopefully
they've back ported any major security issues!
What
only 1 thread ? what 's about performance?
yes, many thanks, i will look at your code
Regards,
Laurent
- Mail original -
De: Thomas Glanzmann tho...@glanzmann.de
À: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Envoyé: Samedi 1 Décembre 2012 16:11:35
Objet: Re: share
Moreover, the request list is a read only list. I wanted to modify the
user-name in the authorization function in python, but you cannot, only
rlm_perl is able to do that.
Yes, if someone could enhance the rlm_python it will be great. I looked at the
rlm_python source code, but it is too
On 12/05/2012 05:59 PM, laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
Moreover, the request list is a read only list. I wanted to modify
the user-name in the authorization function in python, but you
cannot, only rlm_perl is able to do that. Yes, if someone could
enhance the rlm_python it will be great. I looked
Hi,
I wonder if a better option wouldn't be something like
rlm_unixsocket which passes the request down a unix socket in a
standard format, and takes the reply in the same way. Then the
various interpreters could run out-of-process.
I was thinking about the same thing the other day after the
Hi,
This is the RedHat RPM which I believe are maintained by RedHat.
Hopefully they've back ported any major security issues!
got the changelog for the 2.1.12 RPM release you are running?
It does both autentication and proxy and I do have status-check
enabled. On the contraller I increased
On 12/05/2012 12:02 PM, Mike Diggins wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Alan Buxey wrote:
In the first instance, upgrade. There is a major security problem
with 2.1.x release. Get 2.2.x onto your system asap.
This is the RedHat RPM which I believe are maintained by RedHat.
Hopefully they've back
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, John Dennis wrote:
On 12/05/2012 12:02 PM, Mike Diggins wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Alan Buxey wrote:
In the first instance, upgrade. There is a major security problem
with 2.1.x release. Get 2.2.x onto your system asap.
This is the RedHat RPM which I believe are
This is my proxy.conf. The only value I've adjusted so far is response
window (from 20 down to 5). Otherwise, I believe it's configured correctly
to failover between the two home servers. I'll have to work on the debugs.
proxy server {
default_fallback= yes
}
home_server
23 matches
Mail list logo
