Re: Post-crash investigations

2012-05-16 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Thank you guys! Phil, your check script works perfectly. Maybe 1.1.8 will behave better. But even if it doesn't, as long as the cluster layer detects it and reacts, it's fine by me. Regards, - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Post-crash investigations

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi, I setup a cluster (Pacemaker) of two freeradius servers on CentOS 5.8 (freeradius 1.1.3). We use it for 802.1X: our switchs (HP Procurve) send it EAP challenges and it authenticates our users/hosts against an ActiveDirectory domain. It's been running smoothly for a month and stopped working

Re: Post-crash investigations

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Thanks to both of you for taking the time to answer. I would strongly recommend you migrate to FR 2.1.12 - not only is it maintained, with latest features, bug fixes etc but it is also faster. Unfortunately, this is not an option. HPIDM3 (a radius plugin provided by HP) doesn't work with

Re: Post-crash investigations

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Will do. Thanks. 2012/5/15 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com: Julien Cornuwel wrote: I setup a cluster (Pacemaker) of two freeradius servers on CentOS 5.8 (freeradius 1.1.3).  If you're stuck on 1.1.x, use 1.1.8.  Really.  Don't do ANYTHING else until you upgrade.  It could be a solved

Re: Post-crash investigations

2012-05-15 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Thank you. I'll try that as soon as I'm done upgrading to 1.1.8 2012/5/15 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk: On 15/05/12 13:21, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Thanks to both of you for taking the time to answer. I would strongly recommend you migrate to FR 2.1.12 - not only is it maintained