ippool on solatis10 32/64 bit difference

2006-09-08 Thread Sascha Djuric
Hello All I already posted on this list about my probs with ippool. now with the help of some members on this list i got it running on a 32-Bit solaris system. now doing the same on a 64 Bit solaris system (intel 64 by dell) i only get the message ippool: Attribute Pool-Name not found there

Re: ippool on solatis10 32/64 bit difference

2006-09-08 Thread Sascha Djuric
Sorry for being so sloppy, this is 1.1.3 Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:07:58 -0400 Von: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Betreff: Re: ippool on solatis10 32/64 bit difference Sascha Djuric

ippool causes Auth-Type error

2006-09-04 Thread Sascha Djuric
Hello this is my second try: im using freeradius 1.1.3 under solaris10. i got it installed and configured with mysql. everything works fine, I added a user with Password and all and radtest works fine. next i configured an ippool and added it to post-auth and acct. ippool main_pool {

Re: ippool causes Auth-Type error

2006-09-04 Thread Sascha Djuric
and radgroupcheck with ':=' op. Thx for Your help Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:33:59 -0400 Von: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Betreff: Re: ippool causes Auth-Type error Sascha Djuric [EMAIL

(no subject)

2006-08-30 Thread Sascha Djuric
hello all im new to radius, but i got freeradius configured with mysql. radtest is working fine for my test user. now i configured an ippool, which get successfully loaded on startup. again radtest works fine, only new thing is the following trace: rlm_ippool: enter postauth rlm_ippool: Could

ippool auth-type error

2006-08-30 Thread Sascha Djuric
SORRY NOW WITH PROPER SUBJECT :D hello all im new to radius, but i got freeradius configured with mysql. radtest is working fine for my test user. now i configured an ippool, which get successfully loaded on startup. again radtest works fine, only new thing is the following trace: