RE: Source IP address for proxy requests

2006-09-26 Thread Sebastien Cantos
I've you seen my post or are you just ignoring it ? :) -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Angel L. Mateo Envoyé : mardi 26 septembre 2006 08:34 À : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Objet : Re: Source IP address for proxy requests El

RE: Source IP address for proxy requests

2006-09-25 Thread Sebastien Cantos
On the active server (the one that have 192.168.1.1) you have to delete the route that route packets through 192.168.1.2 for subnet 192.168.1.1/24 and make sure there's a route through 192.168.1.1 for subnet 192.168.1.1/24. This way, all connexion initiate from this box will have source address

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Yes its possible. However you will have to store passwords in clear text format onto the ldap. De: freeradius-users-bounces+s.can[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé: lundi 31 juillet 2006 12:13 À: FreeRadius users mailing list

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
    . Regards, Sebastien. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé: lundi 31 juillet 2006 14:31 À: FreeRadius users mailing list Objet: Re: ippool error On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé: lundi 31 juillet 2006 16:26 À: FreeRadius users mailing list Objet: Re: ippool error On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've something like this in the user file: That's Ok

RE: rlm_ippool and tcp TIME_WAIT state

2006-07-19 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Hi, Ive noticed that rlm_ippool is nearly always reassigning an IP address that has just been releasing for a new connexion. This cause some TCP connexion problems because of the TIME_WAIT state. Scenario: 1/ one device connects using source port 1024 (ppp) and gets an IP address

RE: rlm_ippool and tcp TIME_WAIT state

2006-07-19 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Phil Mayers wrote: It would in theory be possible to save the key from the last walk, and next time we allocate an IP start from that key and wrap back around, which would allocate IPs in a more round-robin fashion. Yes, that should be a solution. I was more thinking of adding a parameter