"Stungo, Jamie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our
> Solaris 9 platform.
0.9.3 has issues on Solaris. I don't know if those issues would
cause the problem you're seeing, but they might.
1.0.1 has different (endian) issues on Sparc,
Is it
prstat reporting incorrectly?
JS
-Original Message-
From: Robert Banniza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -fp ) to see
what kind of sys
-Original Message-
> From: Robert Banniza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 1:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
> Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -fp ) to see
> what kin
ing. Is it
prstat reporting incorrectly?
JS
-Original Message-
From: Robert Banniza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -f
Kalevras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 10/5/2004 11:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are experiencing some unexpected behaviou
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kalevras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/5/2004 11:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are experiencing some u
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our Solaris 9
> platform. We use two V240 dual processor SPARC machines, LDAP back-end, flat
> file accounting. I have heavily indexed the directory and it seems lightning
> fast,
Hi all,
We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our Solaris 9 platform.
We use two V240 dual processor SPARC machines, LDAP back-end, flat file accounting. I
have heavily indexed the directory and it seems lightning fast, slapd is running at
0.2% most of the time, yet rad
8 matches
Mail list logo