Re: CentOS 6.3 and FreeRadius - can't authenticate to Unix

On 10/30/2012 03:23 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: What's the recommended method for authenticating against Linux system users? I thought pam was the better one? Maybe. getpwent() or getspwent() should work. Also, is the "big warning" still valid? Likely, yes. I've b

Re: CentOS 6.3 and FreeRadius - can't authenticate to Unix

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > What's the recommended method for authenticating against Linux system > users? I thought pam was the better one? Maybe. getpwent() or getspwent() should work. > Also, is the "big warning" still valid? Likely, yes. I've been avoiding PAM for nearly a decade now. I

Re: CentOS 6.3 and FreeRadius - can't authenticate to Unix

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: >> ++[unix] returns notfound > > That's pretty definitive. The user isn't in /etc/passwd, or > /etc/shadow. Or, the server can't read it. What's the recommended method for authenticating against Linux system users? I thought pam was the bette

Re: CentOS 6.3 and FreeRadius - can't authenticate to Unix

wd, or /etc/shadow. Or, the server can't read it. > [files] users: Matched entry joe2 at line 6 That entry is wrong, delete it. > One of the steps involved putting the group for freeradius to be > “shadow” but there is no “shadow” group in the group file in CentOS 6.3. That'

Re: CentOS 6.3 and FreeRadius - can't authenticate to Unix

Read the getting started how-to's found here: http://deployingradius.com/ Read the documentation in /etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default paying attention to which module reads passwords out of /etc/shadow Read the debug output, especially lines that begin with "WARNING!" Do not force Auth-Type i

Re: Minor update glitch in FR 2.1.12 rpm (CentOS/RH)

On 05/09/2012 02:53 PM, u...@3.am wrote: Just an FYI (sorry if this has already been covered): Ad nauseam, check the archives which also includes suggestions to mitigate the issue. If you update FR via yum in CentOS or RedHat, as is usual practice with RPMs, conf files that have been

Minor update glitch in FR 2.1.12 rpm (CentOS/RH)

Just an FYI (sorry if this has already been covered): If you update FR via yum in CentOS or RedHat, as is usual practice with RPMs, conf files that have been modified are not overwritten, so the new version is installed with an ".rpmnew" suffix. This works great for most of the co

Re: Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

m git. We recently patched our version of FreeRADIUS for fedora and RHEL6 to include the eerl fix from the 2.1.x git repo You can get the fedora patch from here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=314457 For CentOS 5.8 you'll need to grab the srpm for it, and edit that sp

Re: Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

patch from here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=314457 For CentOS 5.8 you'll need to grab the srpm for it, and edit that spec file to include the patch you find in the above fedora build. Instructions on how to build an RPM from an SRPM can be found h

Re: Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

>  As Fajar said, try the v2.1.x branch from git.  It has some fixes to > the Perl module. Francois, Did these suggestions help? We're getting a rlm_perl segfault, very sporadically. All I see in the logs is: radiusd[21706]: segfault at 10 ip 003e4bc531b1 sp 7f1aafffdd70 error 4 in libpe

Re: Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

Francois Gaudreault wrote: > We installed FR on one CentOS 5.8 today, and we are running into weird > crashing issues. Sometimes RADIUS works fine, sometimes it starts to > crash right after the start. We hooked gdb to it, and it appears to be > related with the rlm_perl module. We

Re: Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Hi, > > We installed FR on one CentOS 5.8 today, and we are running into weird > crashing issues.  Sometimes RADIUS works fine, sometimes it starts to crash > right after the start.  We hooked gdb to it, and it appear

Segfault on CentOS 5.8 with 2.1.12

Hi, We installed FR on one CentOS 5.8 today, and we are running into weird crashing issues. Sometimes RADIUS works fine, sometimes it starts to crash right after the start. We hooked gdb to it, and it appears to be related with the rlm_perl module. We are using an external perl module

Re: pam_radius_auth x86_64 password garbled RHEL/CENTOS 5.8

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Judd Maltin wrote: >> I'm compiling my pam_radius_auth on x86_64 source and getting the >> following in my logs: > ... >> Mar 14 12:57:30 app2 sshd[12858]: pam_radius_auth: Got password ^M^?INCORRECT > >  Another PAM module is butchering the pas

Re: pam_radius_auth x86_64 password garbled RHEL/CENTOS 5.8

Judd Maltin wrote: > I'm compiling my pam_radius_auth on x86_64 source and getting the > following in my logs: ... > Mar 14 12:57:30 app2 sshd[12858]: pam_radius_auth: Got password ^M^?INCORRECT Another PAM module is butchering the password, before it is sent to pam_radius_auth. Go fix that. >

pam_radius_auth x86_64 password garbled RHEL/CENTOS 5.8

Hi Folks, I'm compiling my pam_radius_auth on x86_64 source and getting the following in my logs: Mar 14 12:57:29 app2 sshd[12858]: pam_radius_auth: Got user name jmaltin@ Mar 14 12:57:29 app2 sshd[12858]: pam_radius_auth: Sending RADIUS request code 1 Mar 14 12:57:29 app2 sshd[12858]: pam_radius

[SOLVED] RE: Centos 6 Compile error

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:01 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: RE: Centos 6 Compile error I am checking out the master, should I be using something earlier? David -Original Message- From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:l...@fajar.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:21 AM To

RE: Centos 6 Compile error

David Peterson Wrote: > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:12 AM > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > Subject: Centos 6 Compile error > > Has anyone seen this error? I am not sure what might be missing: RHEL variants don't include EC support in OpenSSL due to some lice

Re: Centos 6 Compile error

entioned, the required components needed to compile apparently isn't present in RHEL/Centos 6. If you want latest version from git which would be the next stable (when it's released), use v2.1.x. If you want latest stable release, use 2.1.12. If you only want something that just works w

RE: Centos 6 Compile error

I am checking out the master, should I be using something earlier? David -Original Message- From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:l...@fajar.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 7:21 AM To: David Peterson-WirelessConnections; FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Centos 6 Compile error On

Re: Centos 6 Compile error

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:12 PM, David Peterson wrote: > Has anyone seen this error?  I am not sure what might be missing: > > In file included from rlm_eap_pwd.h:37, >                 from rlm_eap_pwd.c:39: > eap_pwd.h:42:24: error: openssl/ec.h: No such file or directory You didn't mention whic

Re: Centos 6 Compile error

Hi, > Has anyone seen this error? I am not sure what might be missing: ECC support in OpenSSL - Redhat and their derivitives dont have it. you will need to not have EAP-PWD present and it will then compile not sure when/if Redhat will have ECC supportsome policy decision. rm -rf src/modul

Centos 6 Compile error

Has anyone seen this error? I am not sure what might be missing: In file included from rlm_eap_pwd.h:37, from rlm_eap_pwd.c:39: eap_pwd.h:42:24: error: openssl/ec.h: No such file or directory In file included from rlm_eap_pwd.h:37, from rlm_eap_pwd.c:39: eap_pwd.

Re: How to test FreeRADIUS on CentOS from a remote windows PC using NTRadPing

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Alan Buxey wrote: >> I even tried to telnet 1812 on localhost but it says connection refused. > > yep. firewall. adjust your CentOS default firewall settings - > /etc/sysconfig/iptables > so that your client can talk to the server on UDP 1812

Re: How to test FreeRADIUS on CentOS from a remote windows PC using NTRadPing

Hi, > I have successfully installed and tested freeRADIUS on centOS with MySQL > database. But I wanted to test if the freeRADIUS is accessible from > remote machines as well so I tried to test it using NTRadPing on my > windows PC, but it always say no response from the server. I hav

How to test FreeRADIUS on CentOS from a remote windows PC using NTRadPing

Hi, I have successfully installed and tested freeRADIUS on centOS with MySQL database. But I wanted to test if the freeRADIUS is accessible from remote machines as well so I tried to test it using NTRadPing on my windows PC, but it always say no response from the server. I have added my PC IP to

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

Hi, > I was able to run the server by changing the port in innertunnel to > 18120 But still i am getting the following error > > Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support. > Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support. > Ignoring EAP-Type/peap because we do not

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bhanu Vegesna wrote: > I was able to run the server by changing the port in innertunnel to > 18120 But still i am getting the following error > > Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support. Did you read the message? The default freeradius2 RPM

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

Bhanu Vegesna wrote: > I was able to run the server by changing the port in innertunnel to > 18120 But still i am getting the following error > > Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support. > Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support. > Ignoring EAP-Type/peap

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

I was able to run the server by changing the port in innertunnel to 18120 But still i am getting the following error Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support. Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support. Ignoring EAP-Type/peap because we do not have OpenSSL su

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

Freeradius is already running or there is someone using the same port. Check the error message as it carries the solution. Regards Suman On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Bhanu Vegesna wrote: > listen { >type = "auth" >ipaddr = 127.0.0.0 >port = 1812 > Failed binding to au

Re: Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Bhanu Vegesna wrote: > listen { >        type = "auth" >        ipaddr = 127.0.0.0 >        port = 1812 > Failed binding to authentication address 127.0.0.0 port 1812 as server > inner-tunnel: Address already in use > /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/inner-tunnel

Failed to run Freeradius on CentoS

listen { type = "auth" ipaddr = 127.0.0.0 port = 1812 Failed binding to authentication address 127.0.0.0 port 1812 as server inner-tunnel: Address already in use /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/inner-tunnel[32]: Error binding to port for 127.0.0.0 port 1812 I tried to c

Re: Issue installing FreeRadius with openSSL support on a CentOS Sever

On 12/06/2010 05:00 PM, Hanavan, John (John) wrote: Hi All, We have been trying to install FreeRadius with openSSL support on to a CentOS Sever without much success. The version of FreeRadius and CentOS are listed below. http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ Explains how to build on Red Hat

Re: Failed default PAP and PEAP in CentOS

Hi, > freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 > > If I add, to the top of /etc/raddb/users: > bob Cleartext-Password := "hello" yep - that wouldnt work in 1.x > But I added to the top of /etc/raddb/users of the next way: > > user User-Password == "pass" > Auth-Type := EAP > > And It's Ok. ay

Re: Failed default PAP and PEAP in CentOS

On 09/14/2010 03:24 PM, Javier Richard Quinto Ancieta wrote: CentOS 5.4 installing freeradius from the default base repository freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 You should use a modern version of FreeRADIUS from the 2.x series. It's available under the freeradius2 package name (note the "2

Failed default PAP and PEAP in CentOS

CentOS 5.4 installing freeradius from the default base repository freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 If I add, to the top of /etc/raddb/users: bob Cleartext-Password := "hello" Then when I attempt to start freeradius I get: /etc/raddb/users[1]: Parse error (check) for entry bob: Unknown

Re: service startup problem on CentOS 5.5 & freeradius 2.1.9

Hello, The failure to start daemon using service radiusd start has the following cause : * The problem does not occurs with default config. When /etc/init.d/radiusd is launched by init or using service command, it seems environment does not have $ENV{HOSTNAME} initialized. (CentOS 5.4, CentOS 5.5

Re: service startup problem on CentOS 5.5 & freeradius 2.1.9

On 06/02/2010 12:54 PM, Fred MAISON wrote: Hi all, Did someone encountered automatic startup at boot-time with freeradius 2.1.9-2 on CentOS 5.5 ? chkconfig --list show OK It does say "on" for levels 2,3,4,5 right? /etc/init.d/radiusd start is OK service radiusd start does not w

Re: service startup problem on CentOS 5.5 & freeradius 2.1.9

On 06/02/2010 12:54 PM, Fred MAISON wrote: Hi all, Did someone encountered automatic startup at boot-time with freeradius 2.1.9-2 on CentOS 5.5 ? chkconfig --list show OK radiusd -X show OK /etc/init.d/radiusd start is OK service radiusd stop passes OK service radiusd start does not work

service startup problem on CentOS 5.5 & freeradius 2.1.9

Hi all, Did someone encountered automatic startup at boot-time with freeradius 2.1.9-2 on CentOS 5.5 ? chkconfig --list show OK radiusd -X show OK /etc/init.d/radiusd start is OK service radiusd stop passes OK service radiusd start does not work. radiusd does not start at boot. Any idea ? Best

Re: Centos Yum Packages

John Dennis wrote: > RHEL 6 which is under development and is currently in beta testing does > have FreeRADIUS 2.1.8. So a possible solution would be to upgrade from > RHEL 5 to RHEL 6. If FreeRADIUS 2.1.9 is released shortly I *may* be > able to get it into RHEL 6, 2.1.9 should be released in a

Re: Centos Yum Packages

w the instructions posted here: http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ In the section labeled "How to build an SRPM" that will give you the latest version on any RHEL/CentOS system. Sorry I cannot provide pre-built RPM's for RHEL when the package is already in a RHEL distributio

RE: Centos Yum Packages

k.net...@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+andrew=gpk.net...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Alan Buxey Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2010 2:16 AM To: John Dennis Cc: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Centos Yum Packages Hi, > Another solution is to stabilize FreeRADIUS s

Re: Centos Yum Packages

Hi, > Another solution is to stabilize FreeRADIUS such that the need for > frequent version upgrades is not necessary. Rather than adding new > features focus on bug elimination. Some projects have a stable branch > and an "future" branch. The pace of version releases for FreeRADIUS is > "bris

Re: Centos Yum Packages

On 04/19/2010 11:28 AM, John Dennis wrote: The simple answer is that you shouldn't expect FreeRADIUS to be rebased in RHEL, however if there are enough customer issues with FreeRADIUS 2.1.7 it can be brought up for consideration. I do want to clarify the above. The general procedure in RHEL is

Re: Centos Yum Packages

On 04/19/2010 10:40 AM, Alan Buxey wrote: Hi, for their 5.5 update. They usually follow the Red Hat release by a few weeks. (Or you might consider installing RHEL :-) Also you might want to be aware the RHEL 5.5 update contains FreeRADIUS 2.1.7, not 2.1.8 because 2.1.8 was not available when R

Re: Centos Yum Packages

Hi, > for their 5.5 update. They usually follow the Red Hat release by a few > weeks. (Or you might consider installing RHEL :-) > > Also you might want to be aware the RHEL 5.5 update contains FreeRADIUS > 2.1.7, not 2.1.8 because 2.1.8 was not available when RHEL 5.5 was frozen. given that 2

Re: Centos Yum Packages

On 04/18/2010 07:17 PM, Andrew Paternoster wrote: Hi List Just wondering how to install Freeradius on Centos 5.4 using YUM now that the "Tech preview" is over for redhat. Your best bet is to contact centos.org and find out what their plans are for their 5.5 update. They usually

Centos Yum Packages

Hi List Just wondering how to install Freeradius on Centos 5.4 using YUM now that the "Tech preview" is over for redhat. Thanks -- Andrew Paternoster Senior System Engineer GPK Computers Pty Ltd T 1300 854 223 F 1300 854 228 Did you know that you can now log faults just by sending a

Re: Failed default PAP in CentOS

At 01:17 PM 11/20/2009, t...@kalik.net wrote: http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ#Current_Pre-built_RPM.27s_for_RHEL_5_and_CentOS_5 Just what I needed - thanks! Rick - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Failed default PAP in CentOS

freerad...@corwyn.net wrote: > CentOS 5.2 > installing freeradius from the default base repository > freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 See the Wiki. You can install updated versions of FreeRADIUS. > If I add, to the top of /etc/raddb/users: > bob Cleartext-Password := "hel

Re: Failed default PAP in CentOS

> CentOS 5.2 > installing freeradius from the default base repository > freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 Install current version instead. http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ#Current_Pre-built_RPM.27s_for_RHEL_5_and_CentOS_5 > If I add, to the top of /etc/raddb/users: > bob Cle

Failed default PAP in CentOS

CentOS 5.2 installing freeradius from the default base repository freeradius-1.1.3-1.5.el5_4 If I add, to the top of /etc/raddb/users: bob Cleartext-Password := "hello" Then when I attempt to start freeradius I get: /etc/raddb/users[1]: Parse error (check) for entry bo

Re: Can?t bring it to work on Centos 5.2...

> My goal: > Allowing User authentication for iPhone and Macs with user/password > My current Setup: > > I?ve followed this as far as possible. Only one difference: I did build > freeradius 1.1.7 from source in th

Re: Can?t bring it to work on Centos 5.2...

Nicolas Goutte schrieb: Am 03.07.2009 um 12:24 schrieb Mike: Dear list, after 4 days of work and lots of google searches I?m really in the need for some help! My Setup: A Centos 5.2 x86_64 box, running source installations of postfix 2.5.x and Dovecot Imap with domain and users stored in

Re: Can?t bring it to work on Centos 5.2...

Am 03.07.2009 um 12:24 schrieb Mike: Dear list, after 4 days of work and lots of google searches I?m really in the need for some help! My Setup: A Centos 5.2 x86_64 box, running source installations of postfix 2.5.x and Dovecot Imap with domain and users stored in mysql, all with tls

Can?t bring it to work on Centos 5.2...

Dear list, after 4 days of work and lots of google searches I?m really in the need for some help! My Setup: A Centos 5.2 x86_64 box, running source installations of postfix 2.5.x and Dovecot Imap with domain and users stored in mysql, all with tls enabled. Edimax AccessPoint 7206PDg My goal

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

suggested fix. Thank you for reporting this. This is fantastic! I won't have to maintain my own freeradius package for CentOS 5. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 00:29:20 up 10 days, 1:39, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.22, 0.24

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

ably show up by >> Tuesday). You may want to wait to pick up these RPM's instead of the 2.1.3. > > I just rebuilt 2.1.6 SRPM on RHEL5. I didnt' use packages from > http://people.redhat.com/jdennis/freeradius-rhel-centos since I > already have freeradius 2.1.3 installed a

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> I just rebuilt 2.1.6 SRPM on RHEL5. > >  Using which spec file? >From http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ#Obtain_a_SRPM > >> After some troubleshooting, I found out that >> /etc/raddb/sites-available/* is NOT marke

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > I just rebuilt 2.1.6 SRPM on RHEL5. Using which spec file? > After some troubleshooting, I found out that > /etc/raddb/sites-available/* is NOT marked as %config(noreplace). > Since sites-enabled only have symlinks to sites-available files, this > effectively means RPM

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

t to wait to pick up these RPM's instead of the 2.1.3. I just rebuilt 2.1.6 SRPM on RHEL5. I didnt' use packages from http://people.redhat.com/jdennis/freeradius-rhel-centos since I already have freeradius 2.1.3 installed as freeradius RPM, not freeradius2. I was hoping that upgrading

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

John Dennis wrote: Did you read the FAQ listed at the top. The section "Why are there optional subpackages instead of just one package?" should have explained it, was it not clear? If so I'll update it to make it clearer if you explain what was not clear. Yes I read it and read it again afte

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Just E. Mail wrote: > John Dennis wrote: >> >> http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ >> > I read response from John Dennis and looked at the web site URL he > provided. I am ready to install FR and I have one more question! > > In my setup, I plan to (1) Install FR and test it and if everythi

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Hi, > freradius-2.2.1.6-1.el5.i386.rpm > freradius-postgresql-2.2.1.6-1.el5.i386.rpm > > I am pretty new to FR so please advice; do I need to install both of > these RPMs or just the second for my setup to work? both. the second one adds the postgres support. alan - List info/subscribe/unsubsc

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

John Dennis wrote: Just E. Mail wrote: I am trying to install freeRADIUS on a CentOS 5.3 machine with PostgreSQL-8.3.7. My plan is to first install freeRADIUS and test it then setup PostgreSQL as the backend to store data. Is there any freeRADIUS RPMS V#2.1.4 or newer for CentOS? No

FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 RPM's for Fedora, RHEL 5, CentOS 5

The new 2.1.6 FreeRADIUS has been built into a set of RPM's for Fedora, RHEL 5, and CentOS 5. For Fedora the rpm's are in the updates-testing repository for F-9 and F-10. The next release of Fedora is F-11 and is due out shortly, it is currently in the process of being composed for rele

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Hi, > Sure, and that's fine for you, an expert ;-) This user list is proof > positive a large proportion of users can't even read the config > documentation, I can only imagine the confusion which would ensue if > there were two config directories and sets of modules. well, its possiblehoweve

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: > Hi, > >> Also, the package will have a different name, rather than freeradius it >> will be named freeradius2, however (and this is critical) it will >> conflict at the file level, in other words the both freeradius and >> freeradius2 cannot be simultaneously insta

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Hi, > a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: > > I've got freeradius, freeradius2 and RADIATOR all on one box > > What do we need to do so that Radiator can go away? RADSEC :-) well, I've got radsecproxy but currently I need to run RADIATOR to keep my skillsets with that software up to date and chec

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: > I've got freeradius, freeradius2 and RADIATOR all on one box What do we need to do so that Radiator can go away? Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Hi, > Also, the package will have a different name, rather than freeradius it > will be named freeradius2, however (and this is critical) it will > conflict at the file level, in other words the both freeradius and > freeradius2 cannot be simultaneously installed. why not? /etc/raddb2 and sepera

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, John Dennis wrote: >> We expect to provide an official update to RHEL with a 2.x >> version of FreeRADIUS in the next update cycle which would be RHEL 5.5, > > So how do you plan to provide seamless upgrade for RHEL 5 users? > Is freerad

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > So how do you plan to provide seamless upgrade for RHEL 5 users? Upgrades across a major version number of software require manual changes to the configuration. > Is freeradius 1.1.3 config compatible with 2.x? Or do we have to do a > clean install? The configuratio

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, John Dennis wrote: > We expect to provide an official update to RHEL with a 2.x > version of FreeRADIUS in the next update cycle which would be RHEL 5.5, So how do you plan to provide seamless upgrade for RHEL 5 users? Is freeradius 1.1.3 config compatible with 2

Re: current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

John Dennis wrote: > It is critical to note for RHEL customers the updated RPMS are > considered "tech preview" and do not come with any official RHEL > support. If they want support for *any* version of the server, it's available. See http://networkradius.com But that's specific to FreeRADI

current RHEL/CentOS pre-built packages (Was: freeRADIUS)

Just E. Mail wrote: > I am trying to install freeRADIUS on a CentOS 5.3 machine with > PostgreSQL-8.3.7. My plan is to first install freeRADIUS and test it > then setup PostgreSQL as the backend to store data. > > Is there any freeRADIUS RPMS V#2.1.4 or newer for CentOS? No, the

Re: Centos 5.3 problem

> I was running freeradius 2.0.5 on my Centos 5.2 server > using rlm_perl. When I upgraded to 5.3 I get : > > "rlm_perl: perl_parse failed: /billing/bin/billing.pl not found or has > syntax errors." > > I googled it and found that this may be caused by libperl.so

Re: Centos 5.3 problem [SOLVED]

It was a cifs problem. The script was being shared by a samba server and after the upgrade I got : Setuid/gid script is writable by world. And this made radius to fail. I moved the script locally and it works. Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote: I was running freeradius 2.0.5 on my Centos 5.2 server

Centos 5.3 problem

I was running freeradius 2.0.5 on my Centos 5.2 server using rlm_perl. When I upgraded to 5.3 I get : "rlm_perl: perl_parse failed: /billing/bin/billing.pl not found or has syntax errors." I googled it and found that this may be caused by libperl.so not being linked properly or Da

Re: FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4

Please give file /usr/local/etc/raddb/certs/server.pem, to check if u have it. - Original Message - From: Glen Millard To: FreeRadius users mailing list Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 8:32 PM Subject: Re: FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4 Hi ; I thank you much for your

Re: FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4

usr/local/etc/raddb/eap.conf[17]: Instantiation failed for module "eap" /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[280]: Failed to find module "eap". /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[227]: Errors parsing authenticate section. } Errors initializing modules 2009/4/18 Вол

Re: FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4

Delete from '/usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled' all files, except 'default'. - Original Message - From: Glen Millard To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 6:00 PM Subject: FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4 Hello

FreeRADIUS 2.1.5 on CentOS 4.4

Hello All; I have been spinning my wheels on this for a couple of days now. I build FreeRADIUS from the source , no errors, builds successfully. However, when I launch the FreeRADIUS server ( radiusd -X) this is what I see. If I use the 'fake' certs ( the test ones with the bootstrap script) ,

Re: New FR server: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8

h mysql support, and I have only > two OS options: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8. > > I used only FreeBSD, but now I have only these two options. > > Any suggestions? > > Thx > > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > - List i

Re: New FR server: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8

Hi, > Please accept my apologies for this complicate question. > > I need make a new FR server from sources with mysql support, and I have only > two OS options: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8. > > I used only FreeBSD, but now I have only these two options. > > Any suggestions?

Re: New FR server: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8

Im a bit biased towards ubuntu, but i can say from experience that it is relatively easy to implement in ubuntu. My limited experience with centos has been with squid and websense, which was quite annoying to implement. (packages didn't exist/were too old) On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:48 AM, T

New FR server: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8

Hi all, Please accept my apologies for this complicate question. I need make a new FR server from sources with mysql support, and I have only two OS options: CentOS 5 or Ubuntu 8. I used only FreeBSD, but now I have only these two options. Any suggestions? Thx - List info/subscribe

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 08:48:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've gone down the route of using the SPEC file to build the latest > release several times - but in most cases its just GIT repository all > the time > > (the main issue with RPMs is they give the idea of stability > and often

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

Hi, > Or what else? Is just running ./confugure; make; make install (and > not using RPMs at all) better than taking a Fedora src.rpm to start with? for some people, yes (though only so long as all the supporting libraries and dev packages have been installed via RPM first ;-) ) I've gone down

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 06:00:20PM +0100, Marinko Tarlac wrote: > >Just one comment from a system management point of view: if you run > >CentOS, meant as a stable production OS, you probably wants to care > >for not screwing up your system. Installing software without an

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

Jos Vos wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:16:50PM +0100, Marinko Tarlac wrote: configure is your friend. Read output and install what is needed. Just one comment from a system management point of view: if you run CentOS, meant as a stable production OS, you probably wants to care for

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

antic posts to mail lists like this that could have been avoided. -Ted- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just one comment from a system management point of view: if you run CentOS, meant as a stable production OS, you probably wants to care for not screwing up your system. Installing software wi

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

Hi, > Just one comment from a system management point of view: if you run > CentOS, meant as a stable production OS, you probably wants to care > for not screwing up your system. Installing software without an > RPM, especially software that already is provided by the distro >

RE: Centos 5.2 How To

>I managed to get it started, When i do a radcheck i now get the >following error... > .. >users: Matched entry DEFAULT at line 152 .. >rlm_sql (sql): sql_set_user escaped user --> 'radius' >radius_xlat: 'SELECT id, UserName, Attribute, Value, op FROM >radcheck WHERE Userna

RE: Centos 5.2 How To

of id 33 to 127.0.0.1 port 38949 Waking up in 4 seconds... --- Walking the entire request list --- Cleaning up request 0 ID 33 with timestamp 492ea321 Nothing to do. Sleeping until we see a request. I have a feeling it is looking for a record in the radgroupcheck table, but this table is empty, sh

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 03:16:50PM +0100, Marinko Tarlac wrote: > configure is your friend. Read output and install what is needed. Just one comment from a system management point of view: if you run CentOS, meant as a stable production OS, you probably wants to care for not screwing up y

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

#yum install mysql-devel mysql (see what is missing and install it with yum) FreeRadius install from tar.gz archive (www.freeradius.org -> Downloads). 2.1.1 works perfectly. # wget . # tar -xvzf freeradiustar.gz # ./configure # make # make install Location is /usr/local/etc/raddb confi

Re: Centos 5.2 How To

Bashir Jahed wrote: > Ok, > > I have re-installed, updated, installed freeradius. Freeradius-mysql, > mysql, mysql-devel. Created db, imported tables from examples in > /usr.share/doc/freradius/.../...sql as per docs. Created db user, edited > sql.conf file to match, uncommented sql in authorize a

  1   2   >