On Wednesday 16 August 2006 18:09, Alex French wrote:
Boina,
That works fine for me (patching against a clean 1.1.2 tree) I've only
tested == and := operators but they seem fine.
Only one point to note; if you do not include an element in the hash with
the same name as the attribute ( e.g.
Boina,That works fine for me (patching against a clean 1.1.2 tree) I've only tested == and := operators but they seem fine.Only
one point to note; if you do not include an element in the hash with
the same name as the attribute (
e.g. due to a typo or just a misconfiguration), the server hangs
On Monday 14 August 2006 21:27, Alex French wrote:
Boian,
Thanks, if you have a patch that actually implements the hash for the
operator etc, that would be great (in fact, why not just submit it as a
feature). If it's just to c-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On Monday 14 August 2006 21:27, Alex French wrote:
Boian,
Thanks, if you have a patch that actually implements the hash for the
operator etc, that would be great (in fact, why not just submit it as a
feature). If it's just to change the operator hardcoded in rlm_perl.c,
that's fine, I have
On Friday 11 August 2006 20:18, Alex French wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if anything was done on the issue below? I'm looking for
this functionality too, and I'd prefer not to have to recompile the module
if the feature is available in HEAD or similar (although I can't see
that...).
No
On 13/08/06, Boian Jordanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 11 August 2006 20:18, Alex French wrote: Hi, Does anyone know if anything was done on the issue below? I'm looking for this functionality too, and I'd prefer not to have to recompile the module
if the feature is available in HEAD or
Hi,Does anyone know if anything was done on the issue below?
I'm looking for this functionality too, and I'd prefer not to have to
recompile the module if the feature is available in HEAD or similar
(although I can't see that...).
Thanks,AlexOn 22/06/06, Kenneth Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 19:05, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:05:04AM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
Kenneth Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to use rlm_perl to append a number to one
member of the reply packet using rlm_perl and the %RAD_REPLY
hash. I am
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:58:54AM +0300, Boian Jordanov wrote:
Maybe passing a HASH ref for hash which contains the Operator key and the vp
item too will be a good idea. For example
$hash{'Tunnel-Id'} = visitor;
$hash{'Operator'} = :=;
$RAD_REPLY{'Tunnel-Id'} = \%hash;
This way we
Kenneth Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to use rlm_perl to append a number to one
member of the reply packet using rlm_perl and the %RAD_REPLY
hash. I am running freeradius-1.1.1.
I don't think you can do that with rlm_perl. The inability to specify
operator is limiting.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:23:13AM +0300, Boian Jordanov wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 02:17, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
Dear Freeradius Users:
I am trying to use rlm_perl to append a number to one
member of the reply packet using rlm_perl and the %RAD_REPLY
hash. I am running
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:05:04AM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
Kenneth Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to use rlm_perl to append a number to one
member of the reply packet using rlm_perl and the %RAD_REPLY
hash. I am running freeradius-1.1.1.
I don't think you can do that
Dear Freeradius Users:
I am trying to use rlm_perl to append a number to one
member of the reply packet using rlm_perl and the %RAD_REPLY
hash. I am running freeradius-1.1.1. Here is the code that
I am using, a modified example.pl:
use strict;
# use ...
# This is very important ! Without this
13 matches
Mail list logo
