Re: Framed-Route and proxying

2005-11-08 Thread Joe Maimon
Jason Frisvold wrote: Hi there, I'm looking for a way to force certain users through a proxy. I *think* Framed-Routes are the way to go. Can someone help me out a little? Framed-Route instructs the NAS to install a route as described by the value, to the dialed up user. (at least that

Re: Framed-Route and proxying

2005-11-08 Thread Jason Frisvold
On 11/8/05, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Framed-Route instructs the NAS to install a route as described by the value, to the dialed up user. (at least that what my nas's do) So in and of itself, I do not think it will accomplish any sort of forced proxying. Right.. the framed route

Re: Framed-Route and proxying

2005-11-08 Thread Alan DeKok
Jason Frisvold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *think* that's more what I'm looking for.. The idea is to put a user in a suspended group that will only allow them to go to the payment server. By using a proxy, I can intercept all port 80 traffic and redirect them to the proper location. That's

Re: Framed-Route and proxying

2005-11-08 Thread Joe Maimon
Jason Frisvold wrote: I *think* that's more what I'm looking for.. The idea is to put a user in a suspended group that will only allow them to go to the payment server. By using a proxy, I can intercept all port 80 traffic and redirect them to the proper location. Does that make more

Framed-Route and proxying

2005-11-07 Thread Jason Frisvold
Hi there, I'm looking for a way to force certain users through a proxy. I *think* Framed-Routes are the way to go. Can someone help me out a little? Our users either dial in via a Patton RAS unit, or a Redback SMS-500. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold