Hello all,
I am implementing Free Radius to authenticate DHCP Requests with Option82. I
have configured DHCP Relay Agent, DHCP Snooping in CISCO Switch and DHCP
Server. Now i have to configure RADIUS for option82.
Please help me to configure RADIUS for DHCP option82. Also i am not clear who
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sachin.sha...@wipro.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am implementing Free Radius to authenticate DHCP Requests with Option82.
I have configured DHCP Relay Agent, DHCP Snooping in CISCO Switch and DHCP
Server. Now i have to configure RADIUS for option82.
Are you
sachin.sha...@wipro.com wrote:
I am implementing Free Radius to authenticate DHCP Requests with
Option82. I have configured DHCP Relay Agent, DHCP Snooping in CISCO
Switch and DHCP Server. Now i have to configure RADIUS for option82.
What does that mean?
It's like saying configure a web
+sachin.sharma=wipro@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:29 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: FreeRadius to authenticate DHCP Requests with Option82
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:16 PM, sachin.sha...@wipro.com wrote:
Hello all
sachin.sha...@wipro.com wrote:
I already configured DHCP Server that handles option 82 of DHCP Requests. But
new to RADIUS stuff. For security reasons, We want to introduce radius so
DHCP Offer is to be made only to authenticated clients.
Ah. That isn't a common configuration. But it
On 2012/02/22 01:10 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Yes.
If you use FreeRADIUS for both RADIUS and DHCP, you can track user
status in a database. When you receive a RADIUS packet, update the
database. When you receive a DHCP packet, query the database.
Traditional DHCP servers (i.e. ISC)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Johan Meiring
jmeir...@pcservices.co.za wrote:
Another option which we use very successfully is a Mikrotik DHCP server.
It can talk to Freeradius.
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/DHCP_Server
It works well.
Good documentation.
So basically the dhcp
Hi
Can you tell me something about performances?
I'm using Mtik as NAS for PPPoE users and 500-600 online users per
server is optimum according to my experiences (Quad core server, 2GB
RAM,...).
ISC DHCP works very well for 6000 users and the same number of cable
modems but I'm not sure is
Marinko Tarlać wrote:
Can you tell me something about performances?
It all depends on the DB, because that's where IPs are stored.
For a normal database, 1000 packets/s should be possible.
I'm using Mtik as NAS for PPPoE users and 500-600 online users per
server is optimum according to
No No, you didn't understand me...
Mtik is installed on the server (HP ML3xx series) and the optimum is
500-600 online PPPoE users... I achieved 1100 online PPPoE users per
Mikrotik but the CPU load was always to high and the packet loss was to
high (1-2%). The problem is visible because the
10 matches
Mail list logo
