Scott Lambert wrote:
Is this something you are willing to add to the codebase or should the
FreeBSD port track this patch, and the one for radclient.c?
I've added it to CVS.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Scott Lambert wrote:
Could the server do the bind calls for the listen sockets and check
to see if the bound IP is the same as the one specified in the bind
call and if not, update the server to use the bound IP rather than the
configured IP at least in the case of listen { ipaddr = * }.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:57:36PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
Could the server do the bind calls for the listen sockets and check
to see if the bound IP is the same as the one specified in the bind
call and if not, update the server to use the bound IP rather than the
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:59:25AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
I've been expecting that there would be a similar chunk of code in the
server that I could go find if you thought I was on the right track.
Unfortunately, there isn't.
Okay, I'm not going crazy then...
I just wanted to ping the list just in case my last message had been
caught in a spam filter or otherwise missed. I'm not trying to be
pushy, just don't want to get into a situation where everyone is waiting
on a response from everyone else. Just want to make sure I'm the only
one waiting. :-)
Scott Lambert wrote:
If I need to look deeper into the problem on my own, I will be happy to
do so. If I have, once again, picked on a piece of the code that has
no bearing in my issue, please don't be afraid to tell me I am being
stupid.
I don't think I have any issues doing that...
...
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
If I need to look deeper into the problem on my own, I will be happy to
do so. If I have, once again, picked on a piece of the code that has
no bearing in my issue, please don't be afraid to tell me I am being
Scott Lambert wrote:
I've been expecting that there would be a similar chunk of code in the
server that I could go find if you thought I was on the right track.
Unfortunately, there isn't.
I would not expect that code in radclient.c could fix radiusd. I've
been wrong before.
It won't.
Scott Lambert wrote:
lrad_packet_list_socket_add() is called with a pointer to the radius
request packet list structure and the socket file descriptor of the
socket which has been created with the call to socket() and bound to an
IP and port by bind() during the prior call to lrad_socket().
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
lrad_packet_list_socket_add() is called with a pointer to the radius
request packet list structure and the socket file descriptor of the
socket which has been created with the call to socket() and bound to an
Scott Lambert wrote:
I've added some debug prints to lrad_packet_list_socket_add and changed
up the printfs in lrad_packet_list_find_byreply. I don't know that they
will help. But, just in case
The problem is this:
In jailed client:
radclient: main:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:37:14AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
I've been instrumenting the heck out of anything I thought might be
useful. My coding skills are very rusty, but here's what I've come up
with.
src/lib/packet.c:lrad_packet_cmp() likes the response
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:52:27AM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
I decided to simplify and try just using radclient from the new server
and leaving the FreeRADIUS daemon out of it. That also gets replies but
radclient throws them out because it doesn't think it sent the
Scott Lambert wrote:
I've been instrumenting the heck out of anything I thought might be
useful. My coding skills are very rusty, but here's what I've come up
with.
src/lib/packet.c:lrad_packet_cmp() likes the response packet.
src/lib/packet.c:lrad_packet_find_by_reply() seems to be
Scott Lambert wrote:
I decided to simplify and try just using radclient from the new server
and leaving the FreeRADIUS daemon out of it. That also gets replies but
radclient throws them out because it doesn't think it sent the request.
Ok. Both the server and radclient now use the same
15 matches
Mail list logo
