Alan DeKok wrote:
Patric wrote:
I just want to clarify, if I set the reject_delay to 0, and in my
external script the only thing I do is exit(1);, then freeradius will
return a reject response to the NAS?
It will send a reject to the NAS.
Thanks Alan, you're an absolute gem!
Patrick
Alan DeKok wrote:
Patric wrote:
I just want to clarify, if I set the reject_delay to 0, and in my
external script the only thing I do is exit(1);, then freeradius will
return a reject response to the NAS?
It will send a reject to the NAS.
Sorry if Im flogging a dead horse here...
I
Hi,
Framed-Protocol = PPP
User-Name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Password = TestUser
NAS-Port-Type = Virtual
NAS-Port = 1010101010
NAS-Port-Id = x/x/x/xx.xxx
Connect-Info = AutoShapedVC
Service-Type = Framed-User
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you have various other attributes in your real production system - perhaps
you have matching DEFAULT values (eg in users file) which are aiding the
access accept?
If that were the case, then wouldnt this eliminate the problem:
My radiusd.conf authorize section
As per my ramblings below, I ran the server in debug level 3, and one
can see that it is the correct DEFAULT entry that it is picking up :
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1820, id=80,
length=139
Framed-Protocol = PPP
User-Name = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan DeKok wrote:
It's a bug in 1.1.x. It's fixed in 2.0.0
Ah great, at least that explains it! I see the latest public release is
1.1.6, is 2.0.0 available perhaps in the cvs? Would you say it is stable
enough to run in production yet? If not any ETA?
Otherwise can you suggest any
Ah great, at least that explains it! I see the latest public release is
1.1.6, is 2.0.0 available perhaps in the cvs? Would you say it is stable
enough to run in production yet? If not any ETA?
See the main web page? It's all there...
It seems to be in the news section on all the pages
Patric wrote:
Ah great, at least that explains it! I see the latest public release is
1.1.6, is 2.0.0 available perhaps in the cvs? Would you say it is stable
enough to run in production yet? If not any ETA?
See the main web page? It's all there...
Otherwise can you suggest any previous
On Fri 18 May 2007, Patric wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
It's a bug in 1.1.x. It's fixed in 2.0.0
Ah great, at least that explains it! I see the latest public release is
1.1.6, is 2.0.0 available perhaps in the cvs? Would you say it is stable
enough to run in production yet? If not any ETA?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to be in the news section on all the pages *except* the main one.
Your browser has cached the main page.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List
Alan DeKok wrote:
See the main web page? It's all there...
Read, and understood :] Out of curiosity I did compile the latest
snapshot, and I see that it is fixed, and even returns the correct
status based on what your external script returns (1 - rejected, 4 -
handled, 5 - invalid,
Alan DeKok wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to be in the news section on all the pages *except* the main one.
Your browser has cached the main page.
Alan you're gonna give us all an inferiority complex if you continue to
be right all the time! ;]
Cheers
Patric wrote:
I am currently using exec to authenticate users through an external script.
When all criteria match I return the correct access-accept pairs and the
users authenticate successfully.
When the criteria are NOT met, I exit(1) my php script to hand control
back to the freeradius
Hi Alan,
Thanks for ur response.
Alan DeKok wrote:
Set reject_delay = 0 in radiusd.conf.
I just want to clarify, if I set the reject_delay to 0, and in my
external script the only thing I do is exit(1);, then freeradius will
return a reject response to the NAS? Or will it simply not
Patric wrote:
I just want to clarify, if I set the reject_delay to 0, and in my
external script the only thing I do is exit(1);, then freeradius will
return a reject response to the NAS?
It will send a reject to the NAS.
Or will it simply not respond?
Because the complaint my NAS
15 matches
Mail list logo
