Alan Dekok wrote:
Alan Dekok wrote:
Another thing for 2.0.0 (maybe) is to have per-socket configuration.
i.e. socket X can have authorization section X, and socket Y can have
authorization section Y.
It may not be too hard to add, in fact.
Yup. 300 lines of code.
The listener
Alan Dekok wrote:
Jaume wrote:
Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each FreeRadius in a
diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU and O.S.? Somebody tell
me thats possible if each radius is reading from a diferent PATH...
As Josh said, yes.
But why? The server can
Phil Mayers wrote:
Running redundant servers doesn't help much in this case for 2 reasons:
first, we've found that Cisco APs are very, very poor at detecting dead
radius servers and moving to the backup; second, it seems to be
malformed data coming from a certain client so if the APs do
Alan Dekok wrote:
Another thing for 2.0.0 (maybe) is to have per-socket configuration.
i.e. socket X can have authorization section X, and socket Y can have
authorization section Y.
It may not be too hard to add, in fact.
Yup. 300 lines of code.
The listener sections already had
Jaume wrote:
Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each FreeRadius in a
diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU and O.S.? Somebody tell
me thats possible if each radius is reading from a diferent PATH...
As Josh said, yes.
But why? The server can be configured to listen
Hello!
My machine is running FreeRADIUS Version 1.1.3, for host
i686-redhat-linux-gnu under Fedora Core 6 and my question is...
Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each FreeRadius in a
diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU and O.S.? Somebody tell
me thats possible if each
Hi Jaume,
Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each
FreeRadius in a diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU
and O.S.? Somebody tell me thats possible if each radius is
reading from a diferent PATH...
Thanks for any documentacion, link or kind of help.
$ man radiusd
7 matches
Mail list logo
