Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I can't speak for the Tom, but there are legitimate use cases for this.
They're getting more rare.
For example, currently FR does not have limit for a particular virtual
server, port, or purpose (i.e. auth vs acct); everything uses the same
server thread pool. There
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
The solution is to split the DB into two pools. One for accounting
(read/write), and another for authentication (read-only). You can
provision 50 sockets for acct auth, then 100 threads. After that, a
blocked
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Interesting idea. So use the number of db threads to somewhat limit
max number of server threads used for accounting?
Yes.
In our implementation we ended up going with decoupled accounting
instead, which pretty much serialize accounting load to db to the
number of
On 15/05/2012 02:34, 全球无线联盟 wrote:
2. We tried to run multiple radiusd at same server while the second
failed. Can anyone advise how to configure the server to run multiple
radiusd simultaneously？
Why do you need to do this? FreeRADIUS has virtual-server functionality,
so you can create
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James J J Hooper
jjj.hoo...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On 15/05/2012 02:34, 全球无线联盟 wrote:
2. We tried to run multiple radiusd at same server while the second
failed. Can anyone advise how to configure the server to run multiple
radiusd simultaneously？
Why do you
Hi,
1. We know 'radiusd -X' will run the radius in debuge mode. With large
amount user request, the debug information will be massive. It will be
difficult to read one specific user authentication process. Can anyone
advise how to debug a specific user's access process?
raddebug
全球无线联盟 wrote:
1. The output from the radmin is diffirent from Radius -X. While we
consider radiusd -X output more helpful information. While radmin didn't.
Then (a) submit a patch to fix the problem, or (b) live with using
'radiusd -X'
2. We like to filter the debug information for user 1
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:20 PM, 全球无线联盟 2394263...@qq.com wrote:
1. The output from the radmin is diffirent from Radius -X. While we
consider radiusd -X output more helpful information. While radmin didn't.
well, your best option in that case is to use radiusd -X.
You mentioned ixc
Hello everyone,
We use below freeradius. It works well. The OS is Linux Enterprise 5.4. Thanks.
freeradius2.x86_64 2.1.12-3.el5installed
freeradius2-krb5.x86_642.1.12-3.el5installed
freeradius2-ldap.x86_64
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:34 AM, 全球无线联盟 2394263...@qq.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
We use below freeradius. It works well. The OS is Linux Enterprise 5.4.
5.4? really? why not update?
Thanks.
freeradius2.x86_64 2.1.12-3.el5
these packages should come post-5.4. Are you
10 matches
Mail list logo
