Re: issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-31 Thread Christian Hahn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, here my summary for this issue: - - I used FreeRADIUS Version 2.0.0-pre0 (20060830) from CVS - - Attribute 97 is properly coded and delivered to the asking NAS - - so if you need all the rfc3162 attributes use the CVS code thanks for the

Re: issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-30 Thread Christian Hahn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 /usr/local/etc/raddb/users[227]: Parse error (reply) for entry hextest: unknown attribute type 8 Errors reading /usr/local/etc/raddb/users thsi works with the 2.0pre CVS code.. so theres something not quite right in the 1.1.3 code.

issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-29 Thread Christian Hahn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the dictionary.rfc3162 on a fresh compiled freeradius 1.1.3 on CentOS 4.3 x86_64 shows support for attribute 97 - 8 ATTRIBUTE Framed-IPv6-Prefix 97 ipv6prefix - 8 but if I start the server it failes with

Re: issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-29 Thread Alan DeKok
Christian Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hextest Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == secret Service-Type = Framed-User, NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx, Framed-IPv6-Prefix = 2001:db8::::/64, The value for the prefix should be in quotes. The parser for the users

Re: issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-29 Thread Christian Hahn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Alan DeKok wrote: Christian Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hextest Auth-Type := Local, User-Password == secret Service-Type = Framed-User, NAS-IP-Address = xx.xx.xx.xx, Framed-IPv6-Prefix = 2001:db8::::/64,

Re: issue with attribute 97 from rfc3162 in users file

2006-08-29 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, /usr/local/etc/raddb/users[227]: Parse error (reply) for entry hextest: unknown attribute type 8 Errors reading /usr/local/etc/raddb/users thsi works with the 2.0pre CVS code.. so theres something not quite right in the 1.1.3 code. and yes, theres no IPV6PREFIX handler in