Re: rlm_perl forking zombies

2006-06-19 Thread Boian Jordanov
On Friday 16 June 2006 12:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the reply! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By itself, this works and no zombies are left behind, as expected. I understand the problem... How can I use/call the wrapper from rlm_perl (if it's possible at all)? See

Re: rlm_perl forking zombies

2006-06-16 Thread david . suarezdelis
Thanks for the reply! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By itself, this works and no zombies are left behind, as expected. However, when used with FreeRadius, zombies are left behind. FreeRADIUS has a wrapper around fork() that modules are expected to use. The reason is that the server is

rlm_perl forking zombies

2006-06-15 Thread david . suarezdelis
Greetings, I have FreeRadius 1.1.0 working on Debian 3.1 on an Intel box. When using rlm_perl, the authenticate() sub does its job and, eventually, calls a method to send an email to a certain address before returning OK. The problem is that this SMTP connection can take longer than wished,

Re: rlm_perl forking zombies

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Gran
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:42:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Greetings, I have FreeRadius 1.1.0 working on Debian 3.1 on an Intel box. When using rlm_perl, the authenticate() sub does its job and, eventually, calls a method to send an email to a certain address before returning OK.

Re: rlm_perl forking zombies

2006-06-15 Thread Alan DeKok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By itself, this works and no zombies are left behind, as expected. However, when used with FreeRadius, zombies are left behind. FreeRADIUS has a wrapper around fork() that modules are expected to use. The reason is that the server is threaded, and some modules want