Re: rlm_sql: group table changes

2005-04-29 Thread Michael Griego
Stephan Jaeger wrote: For rejecting every user that has no matching group profile i guess my best bet is now to use a DEFAULT profile with Auth-Type := Reject in the db? Yes, that should work. --Mike - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: rlm_sql: group table changes

2005-04-29 Thread Lucas Aimaretto
Hmm... That's a good point. I've updated the rlm_sql module in CVS to handle this situation so that it more closely matches the users file methodology (if there are no check pairs, then the section is automatically matched). Thats great! It gives much more flexibility now

rlm_sql: group table changes

2005-04-28 Thread Stephan Jaeger
Hi, whats the background behind the radgroupreply table now only being read if there are entries in the radgroupcheck table for this group? I just want to add reply attributes for some groups which is not possible any more like it was done before. Whats the intended way now? Regards Stephan

Re: rlm_sql: group table changes

2005-04-28 Thread Michael Griego
Hmm... That's a good point. I've updated the rlm_sql module in CVS to handle this situation so that it more closely matches the users file methodology (if there are no check pairs, then the section is automatically matched). Of course, I'm assuming you're using a CVS version of FreeRADIUS.