Hi,
We are in feature freeze for 3.0. The configuration format and behaviour for
3.0 will be stable between now and the final release (as it was with
release_3_0_0_rc0).
If you are planning on deploying 3.0 and have an existing 2.x.x configuration
you were planning to migrate when the
On 9 Sep 2013, at 08:44, Stefan Winter stefan.win...@restena.lu wrote:
Hi,
We are in feature freeze for 3.0. The configuration format and behaviour for
3.0 will be stable between now and the final release (as it was with
release_3_0_0_rc0).
If you are planning on deploying 3.0 and
Hi,
mv raddb raddb-noinst
mkdir raddb
touch raddb/all.mk
make install
do 'mkdir raddb/mods-config'
you've 'messed around' with the configuration directory which assumes
that mods-config exists... i guess that could be fixed to make dir
directory first if it doesnt exist.
alan
-
List
Hi,
mv raddb raddb-noinst
mkdir raddb
touch raddb/all.mk
make install
do 'mkdir raddb/mods-config'
you've 'messed around' with the configuration directory which assumes
that mods-config exists... i guess that could be fixed to make dir
directory first if it doesnt exist.
The idea
Hi,
Because that all.mk file for the rlm_perl module installs example perl
scripts in mod-config, the same with rlm_python and rlm_ruby.
I guess we'll have to come up with a proper fix.
Does the file need to be created by the rlm's make install? The
example scripts could be put into
On 09/09/13 14:04, Stefan Winter wrote:
Hi,
mv raddb raddb-noinst
mkdir raddb
touch raddb/all.mk
make install
do 'mkdir raddb/mods-config'
you've 'messed around' with the configuration directory which assumes
that mods-config exists... i guess that could be fixed to make dir
directory first
Stefan Winter wrote:
The idea is that make install is not supposed to touch my production
config in any way. I don't want it to generously add directories without
me knowing.
Honestly, the simplest might be to edit Make.inc, at the top where it
defines raddbdir and modconfdir:
ifeq
On 9 Sep 2013, at 14:24, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Stefan Winter wrote:
The idea is that make install is not supposed to touch my production
config in any way. I don't want it to generously add directories without
me knowing.
There's also:
#!/bin/sh
make clean
if ! git
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:18:06PM +0100, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
This negates problems caused by installing over the top of a
previous installation, which IMHO is always an extremely bad
idea with any unpackaged software.
...or even packaged software.
FWIW, I put all freeradius config in
Thanks for the replies:
Ok, uninstalled #1 and updated to freeradius2
radiusd started without a hitch withtesting Cleartext-Password :=
password in users file.
When I ran radtest testing password localhost 0 testing123
Received -bash: /usr/bin/radtest: No such file or directory
For
On 9 Sep 2013, at 17:18, Swenson, Chris cswen...@curry.edu wrote:
Hi all, I have not used radius in about 15 years and found a need recently.
I have set up the rpm on a red hat 5.6 server and when I run radius -X the
system starts fine with the expected info.
That'd be version 1.x.x?
Received -bash: /usr/bin/radtest: No such file or directory
It means radtest command was not found.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Swenson, Chris cswen...@curry.edu wrote:
Thanks for the replies:
Ok, uninstalled #1 and updated to freeradius2
radiusd started without a hitch with
That did it,
In the version 1 the radtest must have been installed with the radius, not as a
separate package.
I have now also successfully tested.
I wonder why the in the ticket I opened with red hat support they did not
suggest the upgrade.
Thanks to all.
Chris S.
-Original
NEVER
On Sep 9, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Swenson, Chris cswen...@curry.edu wrote:
I guess I need to recycle my 2002 Shell O'Reilly book.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 09/09/2013 12:18 PM, Swenson, Chris wrote:
Hi all, I have not used radius in about 15 years and found a need
recently. I have set up the rpm on a red hat 5.6 server and when I
run radius -X the system starts fine with the expected info.
On RHEL5 make sure you install the freeradius2 set of
On 09/09/2013 12:52 PM, Swenson, Chris wrote:
Thanks for the replies:
Ok, uninstalled #1 and updated to freeradius2
radiusd started without a hitch with testing Cleartext-Password :=
password in users file.
When I ran radtest testing password localhost 0 testing123
Received -bash:
Hi all, I have not used radius in about 15 years and found a need recently.
I have set up the rpm on a red hat 5.6 server and when I run radius -X the
system starts fine with the expected info.
When I enter the suggested as the first line in the users file testing
Cleartext-Password
I guess I need to recycle my 2002 Shell O'Reilly book.
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+cswenson=curry@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+cswenson=curry@lists.freeradius.org] On
Behalf Of Swenson, Chris
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:27 PM
Swenson, Chris wrote:
Hi all, I have not used radius in about 15 years and found a need recently.
I have set up the rpm on a red hat 5.6 server and when I run radius -X the
system starts fine with the expected info.
You're running a VERY old version. You may need the freeradius2
package,
No, they are encrypted in the ldap database in md5 hash.
I might be too old to do bleeding edge stuff like 3.0 RC1
I will take a look and a poke at it though.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+cswenson=curry@lists.freeradius.org
On 9 Sep 2013, at 23:00, Swenson, Chris cswen...@curry.edu wrote:
I already have functioning openldap with SSL. (actually a neat little multi
master setup.)
I would like to get this radius to authenticate against the openldap.
You have plaintext passwords then?
I have dug around Google
I already have functioning openldap with SSL. (actually a neat little multi
master setup.)
I would like to get this radius to authenticate against the openldap.
I have dug around Google and found some useful looking pages, but I wonder if
anybody has any hot tips on this so I don't feel like I
Hi,
NEVER
agreed. still a useful reference.
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 10 Sep 2013, at 00:19, Swenson, Chris cswen...@curry.edu wrote:
No, they are encrypted in the ldap database in md5 hash.
Right, but you have the plaintext version from the user?
I might be too old to do bleeding edge stuff like 3.0 RC1
I will take a look and a poke at it though.
Fair
Yeah, bit the goal is that it is passed to the server via a secure web page.
The end goal here is getting authenticated users the right to connect to the
secure ssid's. The Aruba wireless controllers are supposed to do that. If I am
way over my head I have a consultant on contract. RHIP.
Sent
On 09/09/2013 08:46 PM, Swenson, Chris wrote:
Yeah, bit the goal is that it is passed to the server via a secure web
page. The end goal here is getting authenticated users the right to
connect to the secure ssid's. The Aruba wireless controllers are
supposed to do that. If I am way over my
26 matches
Mail list logo
