Hello,
My Wimax device require MPPE keys to be sent in access accept if I change that
setting in module/wimax from no to yes the wimax don't connect anymore.
My problem is not getting my Wimax device connected it's already done.
My problem is that I want specific values of Filter-Id attribute
Hi to all,
what happened to the contents of the wiki? A lot of stuff is missing, for
example http://wiki.freeradius.org/Operators now has nothing more than a few
badly explained examples and the table of the operators is missing. Also I
couldn't find a lot of stuff that I'm sure there was on the
On 01/06/11 10:28, den2k wrote:
Hi to all,
what happened to the contents of the wiki? A lot of stuff is missing,
for example http://wiki.freeradius.org/Operators now has nothing more
than a few badly explained examples and the table of the operators is
missing. Also I couldn't find a lot of
I'm getting:
HTTP Error 500 (Internal Server Error): An unexpected condition was
encountered while the server was attempting to fulfil the request.
...when I try to log in using the GitHub referral/login thing; the error
is from this URL:
2011/6/1 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
On 01/06/11 10:28, den2k wrote:
Hi to all,
what happened to the contents of the wiki? A lot of stuff is missing,
for example http://wiki.freeradius.org/Operators now has nothing more
than a few badly explained examples and the table of the
On 01/06/11 10:57, den2k wrote:
Example?
Right now the operators one. Also users and huntgroups were better
descripted before, now there is just some brief introduction and nothing
more. It was the lack of any explanation that I was referring to as lack
of material (I'm not an English
den2k wrote:
what happened to the contents of the wiki? A lot of stuff is missing,
for example http://wiki.freeradius.org/Operators now has nothing more
than a few badly explained examples and the table of the operators is
missing.
Click on the edit link. The content is still there, it is
Phil Mayers wrote:
I'm getting:
HTTP Error 500 (Internal Server Error): An unexpected condition was
encountered while the server was attempting to fulfil the request.
...when I try to log in using the GitHub referral/login thing; the error
is from this URL:
den2k wrote:
Right now the operators one. Also users and huntgroups were better
descripted before, now there is just some brief introduction and nothing
more. It was the lack of any explanation that I was referring to as lack
of material (I'm not an English native-speaker so I make some
On 01/06/11 11:17, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 01/06/11 10:57, den2k wrote:
Example?
Right now the operators one. Also users and huntgroups were better
descripted before, now there is just some brief introduction and nothing
more. It was the lack of any explanation that I was referring to as lack
2011/6/1 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
den2k wrote:
what happened to the contents of the wiki? A lot of stuff is missing,
for example http://wiki.freeradius.org/Operators now has nothing more
than a few badly explained examples and the table of the operators is
missing.
Click
On 2011/06/01 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
...in which the migration technique was discussed, and help was requested to
reformat documents which had not migrated seamlessly.
-
Is the old wiki accessable anywhere so one can help to manually transfer info?
--
Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services
On 01/06/11 11:54, Johan Meiring wrote:
On 2011/06/01 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
...in which the migration technique was discussed, and help was
requested to
reformat documents which had not migrated seamlessly.
-
Is the old wiki accessable anywhere so one can help to manually transfer
Johan Meiring wrote:
Is the old wiki accessable anywhere so one can help to manually transfer
info?
$ git clone git://wiki.freeradius.org/wiki.freeradius.org.git
That gets you *all* of the content.
You can't push changes, but you can paste the results into the edit
page.
Alan DeKok.
-
Hello,
I have a problem with my pools in freeradius. The problems is that it
is not releasing IPs from the pools. At least, not all of them, so after
a while my users can't connect because the pool is full.
I check that it is not releasing IPs because I get (I have replaced
usernames with
I just use Framed-Filter-Id = profilename in the reply.
When you added:
update reply {
WiMAX-FA-RK-Key = 0x00
WiMAX-MSK = %{reply:EAP-MSK}
Filter-Id = Profile1
}
That replies with only 1 filter ID.
Hi,
I've been updating some of the wiki pages to fix the formatting, etc.
Arran put together a list of pages that were a priority at
http://wiki.freeradius.org/New-Wiki. Are there other pages that people
wish to have done next? (I'll try to fix the Operators page tonight. I
fixed the
Hi,
my freeradius works as a proxy, terminates eap and proxy the request
with mschap to another freeradius.
When Passing reply from proxy back into the tunnel the proxy quits
with a segmentation fault.
This happens, with little difference, when sending the accept or reject
back to NAS.
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Simon
Simon L. schrieb:
Hi,
my freeradius works as a proxy, terminates eap and proxy the request
with mschap to
Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Use the v2.1.x branch. It will become 2.1.11 soon.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Alan DeKok schrieb:
Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
Use the v2.1.x branch. It will become 2.1.11 soon.
Alan
On 01/06/11 15:45, Simon L. wrote:
ok now i found this:
https://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/2011-April/msg00295.html
This means, i should download the latest freeradius from git master branch?
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
Simon L. fantasn...@ki.tng.de wrote:
I hope anyone got this before and can give a solution.
Please have a look in my debug log attached.
Going to need some GDB lovin' too.
http://freeradius.org/radiusd/doc/bugs
If you are compiling from source, I recommend you go with the git
version
Hello,
I am looking for some guidance on configuring clients that will send
requests with different NAS-Port-Type’s.
Devices: HP Procurve, Cisco, Aruba wireless controllers
Possible NAS-Port-Types: Ethernet, Virtual, Wireless, Async
Ex., for an HP procurve switch, the possibilities will be:
1.
John,
It's ok, I fixed it this morning. Thanks for your help with the other pages and
your continued conversion efforts :)
Cheers,
Arran
On Jun 1, 2011, at 5:51 AM, John Center wrote:
Hi,
I've been updating some of the wiki pages to fix the formatting, etc. Arran
put together a list of
DaveA wrote:
In this case, I would like to send CLI and 802.1x requests to different
virtual servers, because I accomplish #1 painlessly with ldap, and #2 gets
more complicated with ads and eduroam in the mix.
I have read through clients.conf and do not believe it can be done there.
Where
DaveA daldw...@uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I am looking for some guidance on configuring clients that will send
requests with different NAS-Port-Type???s.
Devices: HP Procurve, Cisco, Aruba wireless controllers
Possible NAS-Port-Types: Ethernet, Virtual, Wireless, Async
Ex., for an HP procurve
On Jun 1, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
DaveA daldw...@uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I am looking for some guidance on configuring clients that will send
requests with different NAS-Port-Type???s.
Devices: HP Procurve, Cisco, Aruba wireless controllers
Possible NAS-Port-Types:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
You can do an internal proxy, but last time I checked multiple chained
internal proxies were broken (I tried something very similar a few years ago).
You can proxy to one virtual server. But that request can't be
proxied again. It's too awkward to deal with that.
Phil Mayers wrote:
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
segfault if the remote proxy returns an Access-Reject.
I haven't had time to test this yet.
I'd like to release 2.1.11 soon. Maybe next week?
Alan DeKok.
-
List
We use EAP-TLS method, but in the Server Hello message don't want to send the
certificate. How can it be disabled
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
We use EAP-TLS method, but in the Server Hello message don't want to send the
certificate. How can it be disabled
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
We use EAP-TLS method, but in the Server Hello message don't want to send the
certificate. How can it be disabled
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 06/01/2011 08:28 PM, Lubenski, Zeev [GCS] wrote:
We use EAP-TLS method, but in the Server Hello message don’t want to
send the certificate. How can it be disabled
It can't. EAP-TLS requires a server certificate and a client
certificate. Neither are optional, and neither can be disabled.
On 06/01/2011 07:32 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
No, v2.1.x
Beware: I have since been informed that there is still a potential
segfault if the remote proxy returns an Access-Reject.
I haven't had time to test this yet.
I'd like to release 2.1.11 soon. Maybe next week?
Well
Paul
In the RFC 5216 I see:
The EAP server will then respond with an EAP-Request packet with
AP-Type=EAP-TLS. The data field of this packet will encapsulate one
or more TLS records.
These will contain a TLS server_hello handshake
message, possibly followed by TLS certificate
This leads to
On 06/01/2011 09:07 PM, Lubenski, Zeev [GCS] wrote:
Paul
In the RFC 5216 I see:
The EAP server will then respond with an EAP-Request packet with
AP-Type=EAP-TLS. The data field of this packet will encapsulate one
or more TLS records.
These will contain a TLS server_hello handshake
message,
Paul
Thanks a lot
Regards
Zeev
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+zlubensk=lgsinnovations@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+zlubensk=lgsinnovations@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 3:15 PM
To:
On 06/01/2011 09:00 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
I'll try to test the Access-Reject thing tomorrow; I'm betting it'll be
a trivial fix.
Huh. It works just fine for me on v2.1.x HEAD. I'll try to dig out the
email where someone said it was faulty (IIRC they said they'd emailed
you also Alan). I
Lubenski, Zeev [GCS] zlube...@lgsinnovations.com wrote:
This leads to believe that certificate is not mandatory ?
...which leads us to wonder why you want to use EAP-TLS?
Probably best to answer:
* what is it you are trying to do
* how are you trying to accomplish it
* what are you
I was wondering if someone could help me determine why checkrad isn't
being called. I've followed the directions in the doc/Simultaneous-Use
but still cannot get checkrad to fire off when I login. It will check
radutmp, but never reaches out to my NAS with checkrad, as evidenced
here from
41 matches
Mail list logo
