On 2011/09/15 06:35 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
Just a quick question, how many DB connections do you have in your config?
5
Server was a VM with too little RAM. And therefore a simple SQL query could
take seconds instead of milliseconds. (Suspect swap meltdown if such a
thing exists)
Had to
dbeutler wrote:
When I run in debug mode, I get the following:
Starting - reading configuration files ...
reread_config: reading radiusd.conf
Config: including file: ../etc/raddb/proxy.conf
Config: including file: ../etc/raddb/clients.conf
Config: including file:
Johan Meiring wrote:
It was just the first time that I didn't see FR recover after the DB
eventually finished with slow queries.
I made a minor change for 2.1.12 which will clear out the pending
queue a lot more quickly.
old:
for each new request
clear out one dead
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
old:
for each new request
clear out one dead request from queue
If the dead requests originally arrived at a higher rate than the new
requests, it can take a long time to clean them out.
Alan please do not forget to add this fix to changelog so it will be
easier for a new FR users...
Best regards
On 9/16/2011 8:45 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Alan DeKokal...@deployingradius.com wrote:
old:
for each new request
clear
Marinko Tarlać wrote:
Alan please do not forget to add this fix to changelog so it will be
easier for a new FR users...
to do...? It doesn't require anyone to do anything. There are no
configuration changes. It's just code internal to the server.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
Of course we don't need to do anything but if this small change inside code
is announced in changelog, more people will upgrade to 2.1.12 and they
will stop bothering us on this list with the same questions, over and
over again :)
On 9/16/2011 9:59 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Marinko Tarlać
Marinko Tarlać wrote:
Of course we don't need to do anything but if this small change inside code
is announced in changelog, more people will upgrade to 2.1.12 and they
will stop bothering us on this list with the same questions, over and
over again :)
Good point.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
On 16/09/11 16:59, denizaydin wrote:
Hi,
I am using Version 2.1.11 for broadband PPP authentication. I want to put
the unauthenticated users to a default service. I have to revert the
access-reject message to access-accept because once CISCO ISG get a
access-reject from the AAA server it's
On 16/09/2011 17:24, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 16/09/11 16:59, denizaydin wrote:
Hi,
I am using Version 2.1.11 for broadband PPP authentication. I want to put
the unauthenticated users to a default service. I have to revert the
access-reject message to access-accept because once CISCO ISG get a
Don't do that.
Instead, don't reject the in the first place. For example:
authorize {
...
sql
if (notfound) {
update control {
Auth-Type := Accept
}
}
}
Above won't work since:
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
-James
James J J Hooper wrote:
Above won't work since:
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
-James
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da
In fact this dictionary change breaks other stuff too, e.g. below:
I've
Hello list!
After reading the list pretty much everyday for a month now, going
through the docs, manuals and a lot of googling (which always brought me
back to the list anyway), I have finally decided which way to go to
filter access to two SSIDs, for 2 groups.
I am using FR 2.1.11 on Debian
I guess all the regex gurus will laugh at my request I figured it
out, for others, looks like this works: .*:SSID_ABC !
On 9/16/2011 6:22 PM, Commonn Systems wrote:
Hello list!
After reading the list pretty much everyday for a month now, going
through the docs, manuals and a lot of
14 matches
Mail list logo
