Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
...
I resubmit the patch as a text file (output of
diff sql_oracle.c.before_patch sql_oracle.c freeradius_oracle_patch)
because from the web page I had
problems applying it and I was forced to apply it partly by hand
editing of the code...
the same problem. I cannot
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 02:23:36PM +0300, Alexander Serkin wrote:
OK here is the patched file. You can verify it if you diff it with the
original file.
Kostas
Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
...
I resubmit the patch as a text file (output of
diff sql_oracle.c.before_patch sql_oracle.c
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:27:18PM +0100, Roberto Re wrote:
hi,
I have applied the patch yesterday only, but the problem still exists.
The cursors are allocated and they continuously increase up to the maximum
limit imposed by Oracle to the db.
I have analysed some of the queries
Kostas Zorbadelos writes:
I am not using RADGROUPCHECK and RADGROUPREPLY either so I have
commented out all the relevant lines for them (including the queries)
in oraclesql.conf. I haven't noticed any problem with cursor
allocating in oracle 8i. Our DBA told me that there are database
parameters
hi,
I have applied the patch yesterday only, but the problem still exists.
The cursors are allocated and they continuously increase up to the maximum
limit imposed by Oracle to the db.
I have analysed some of the queries allocating the cursors: there are some
query to RADGROUPCHECK and
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:25:25PM +0200, Roberto Re wrote:
First of all thanks for your attention, Alan
My problem however seems to be more like this:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-devel/2002-December/004052.html
I had already checked the working code, which includes that
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:13:40AM +0200, Roberto Re wrote:
Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:25:25PM +0200, Roberto Re wrote:
First of all thanks for your attention, Alan
My problem however seems to be more like this:
Hi List,
I have some problem with Oracle too, when any error occured like index violation
oracle just drop
one connection, it says re-connect but I don't think it is not re-connecting, and in
some days
radiusd is out of connection and I got no more connection to Db , login denied message
in
Hi,
apply the patch in the bug number 128. The 1.0.1 version doesn't contain
it. This patch solves your problem and probably manages better the Oracle
connection.
Andrea
At 17.49 14/10/2004, you wrote:
Hi List,
I have some problem with Oracle too, when any error occured like index
violation
First of all thanks for your attention, Alan
My problem however seems to be more like this:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-devel/2002-December/004052.html
I had already checked the working code, which includes that patch and it
is exactly the following one:
Roberto Re [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had already checked the working code, which includes that patch and it
is exactly the following one:
Ok. So are you *still* seeing a problem? If so, no one else has
reported anything similar yet.
Function: sql_free_result , does this function realease
Hi,
I've installed a FreeRADIUS version 1.0.0 on a Linux Red Hat Enterprise
with Oracle Client 9.1, it never close any cursors it opened, leading to
all sorts of interesting problems when the max-open-cursor limits
were hit.
How can I fix this problem ?
Thanks in advance
Roberto
-
List
Roberto Re [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed a FreeRADIUS version 1.0.0 on a Linux Red Hat Enterprise
with Oracle Client 9.1, it never close any cursors it opened, leading to
all sorts of interesting problems when the max-open-cursor limits
were hit.
How can I fix this problem ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
