James wrote:
I did these:
proxy.rst
processing_users_file.rst
cisco.rst
variables.rst
configurable_failover.rst
There might be formatting errors but I think it is a good first pass.
OK. I double-checked them, and put them into the git v2.1.x branch.
The suse/redhat/debian package
James wrote:
Is somebody already working on making .rst files because there are
already some?
Peter Nixon did a few in the master branch. I don't think any more
changes have been made since then.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 06/13/10 03:11, Alan DeKok wrote:
James wrote:
Is somebody already working on making .rst files because there are
already some?
Peter Nixon did a few in the master branch. I don't think any more
changes have been made since then.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 06/13/10 03:11, Alan DeKok wrote:
James wrote:
Is somebody already working on making .rst files because there are
already some?
Peter Nixon did a few in the master branch. I don't think any more
changes have been made since then.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 06/10/10 15:59, Alan DeKok wrote:
bjloc...@lockie.ca wrote:
What file format is the documentation in and roughly how big is it?
Text. Not a lot, but organized fairly poorly.
I'm a technical writer and I'm interested.
Try: http://freeradius.org/doc/community.html
Or, just
Hi,
Peter Nixon wrote:
Hi Johannes
Please feel free to take the lead. While you may of course use the RST viewer
built into github, its better if you install Sphinx
(http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) as you will then be able to build the RST into
html format locally on your machine with:
make html
On Fri 11 Jun 2010, Ramm-Ericson, Johannes wrote:
Hi,
Peter Nixon wrote:
Hi Johannes
Please feel free to take the lead. While you may of course use the RST
viewer built into github, its better if you install Sphinx
(http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) as you will then be able to build the RST
Josip Rodin wrote:
In the meantime I've done some work fixing the Wiki. I invite everyone
watching to have a look, it's now... no longer stuck in 2007. :)
It looks quite a bit better, thanks.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:01:47PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
The enthusiasm seems big enough. So how would this work?
http://freeradius.org/doc/community.html
It doesn't seem to be particularly enthusiastic any more. But that's what
happens in the real world :) A
On Tue 18 May 2010, Alan DeKok wrote:
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Not meaning any disrespect to the paid offer, you could also
reconsider to put up the current documentation in a Wiki style
webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think
needs reworking.
We already
On Tue 18 May 2010, Alan DeKok wrote:
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Not meaning any disrespect to the paid offer, you could also
reconsider to put up the current documentation in a Wiki style
webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think
needs reworking.
We already
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:07:32PM +0300, Peter Nixon wrote:
We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already have a
publicly available doc directory. Few people submit changes.
Yes. I'll second Alan on this. It was my idea to setup the wiki, and I
spent a LOT of time on it for
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:07:32PM +0300, Peter Nixon wrote:
We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already have a
publicly available doc directory. Few people submit changes.
Yes. I'll second Alan on this. It was my idea to
It looks like a good set of volunteers wanting to help. My suggestion
is to convert the docs to Restructured text:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
Looks very straight forward. :)
I'll be creating a github account for myself later this evening and will
start getting my
On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59:57AM -0700, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
That's why I mentioned that ConfirmAccount mediawiki extension - it will
reduce the amount of bother for the admins, while still allowing the users
to use minimal necessary
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
My idea was to install an extension to the wiki that allowed rendering of
RST. The documentation would be kept up to date on the wiki, and at official
release time those pages would be pulled in from the wiki and bundled with
the rest of FreeRADIUS.
Ok. The RST
bjloc...@lockie.ca wrote:
What file format is the documentation in and roughly how big is it?
Text. Not a lot, but organized fairly poorly.
I'm a technical writer and I'm interested.
Try: http://freeradius.org/doc/community.html
Or, just convert the existing txt to rst, and send them
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59:57AM -0700, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
That's why I mentioned that ConfirmAccount mediawiki extension - it will
reduce the amount of bother for the admins, while still allowing the users
to use minimal necessary skills to do their edits.
My idea was to install
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
We're also not in the business of account management. Someone like
github.com is. If they had a Wiki that was RST *and* backed by git, it
would be a clear winner. But people have been asking since 2008, and
it's still not ready.
On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
We're also not in the business of account management. Someone like
github.com is. If they had a Wiki that was RST *and* backed by git, it
would be a clear winner. But people have
bjloc...@lockie.ca wrote:
What file format is the documentation in and roughly how big is it?
Text. Not a lot, but organized fairly poorly.
I'm a technical writer and I'm interested.
Try: http://freeradius.org/doc/community.html
Or, just convert the existing txt to rst, and send
On 06/10/10 16:44, Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
My idea was to install an extension to the wiki that allowed rendering of RST.
The documentation would be kept up to date on the wiki, and at official release
time those pages would be pulled in from the wiki and bundled with the
Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
The problem with volunteer 're-factoring' work, is that although people mean
well when they offer their
assistance, it doesn't usually work out... They'll often spend a couple of
weeks working on the task,
get bored, figure they'll take a break
Need to give something back to the Open Source community. So I'd very happy to
contribute with this project.
I have some experience contributing to standard bodies such as WBA which I'm
the Cochair of RD and authored some of the stage 2 documents in the WiMAX
Forum (GRWG) currently in RiLTE
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
The enthusiasm seems big enough. So how would this work?
http://freeradius.org/doc/community.html
Get some
people to submit an example doc that they've converted, and then you
pick one which is best and assign the job? Or get people to convert
some/all docs, and
Not meaning any disrespect to the paid offer, you could also reconsider to
put up the current documentation in a Wiki style webpage, and from there
everyone can work on the text that they think needs reworking.
Regards
HASSAN
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 13:16, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Not meaning any disrespect to the paid offer, you could also
reconsider to put up the current documentation in a Wiki style
webpage, and from there everyone can work on the text that they think
needs reworking.
We already have a Wiki. Few people edit it. We already
I would like to do this job, but my english is poor, so I can't do it :(
2010/5/18 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Not meaning any disrespect to the paid offer, you could also
reconsider to put up the current documentation in a Wiki style
webpage, and from there
I tried to signup to be able to edit the Wiki, but it seems that signup is
disabled!
Regards
HASSAN
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 14:02, Ana Gallardo ana.gallardo...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to do this job, but my english is poor, so I can't do it :(
2010/5/18 Alan DeKok
Hi,
I'd definitely be willing to help out with this task. Particularly if it could
be turned into a collaborative effort.
Money is nice, however my primary motive would actually be to contribute to an
outstanding piece of software that has been essential in my job. So, should I
become
To: 'freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org'
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an editor for FreeRADIUS documentation
Hi,
I'd definitely be willing to help out with this task. Particularly if it could
be turned into a collaborative effort.
Money is nice, however my
Am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2010 09:16:06 schrieb Alan DeKok:
In the interest of making the project better, we're looking for an
editor for the documentation. The existing documentation is an ad hoc
collection of files thrown together over a decade of effort, and written
by many different people.
I can both write chapters, and also edit the work of other contributors who
are not too well versed in English.
I would still request Alan to reconsider the wiki approach. Perhaps, you
can dictate the structure of the wiki, and we can all contribute to fill up
the contents.
But, whatever the
AM
To: 'freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org'
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an editor for FreeRADIUS documentation
Hi,
I'd definitely be willing to help out with this task. Particularly if it
could be turned into a collaborative effort.
Money is nice
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
The problem with volunteer 're-factoring' work, is that although people mean
well when they offer their assistance, it doesn't usually work out... They'll
often spend a couple of weeks working on the task, get bored, figure they'll
take a break and come back to it
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Personally, I'd be happy if this effort results in the existing docs
being converted to RST. It's easy to read as text, and looks good as HTML.
The enthusiasm seems big enough. So how would this work? Get some
people
36 matches
Mail list logo
